@Patrick H. Lauke (redux) - Odd choice for the M/m to be 8 pixels wide. It could have been 7 to match the T/t and Y/y, with the right side being only 1 pixel wide like other letters instead of 2 pixels...
@Igville - Redux is correct; we often comment on the choices made by others when recreating these fonts. And here was my thought on the M/m, but while it is similar to the N/n, my change does look a tad off-balanced... :^(
8 Comments
@Patrick H. Lauke (redux) - Odd choice for the M/m to be 8 pixels wide. It could have been 7 to match the T/t and Y/y, with the right side being only 1 pixel wide like other letters instead of 2 pixels...
@Goatmeal he probably did that to even it out
@Igville Goat knows that I recreate exactly what's in the original, so his comment was aimed at the original designer :)
@Igville - Redux is correct; we often comment on the choices made by others when recreating these fonts. And here was my thought on the M/m, but while it is similar to the N/n, my change does look a tad off-balanced... :^(
oh sorry
Please sign in to comment.