Love your re-interpretation of traditional Roman serifs! The exaggerated proportions (especially the big, circular bowls) really slots itself snuggly in between Art Deco and Art Noveau styles as well. Those exposed angles and technical lines also really helps give it structure and balance throughout the character set.

My only qualm is that certain letters are a bit too thick ('z') and thin ('t') in some strokes. But other than that, this is a really good conceptual typeface! All the best in the competition!

This is brilliant. 

I like this idea, 10/10. However it needs to be of certain size, to show off all its features. The only shame is, the Fontstruct preview makes the thin lines look too thick. Don't forget the numbers preview, good luck in competition.

10+❤️. Good luck!

i don't like the W, its just a rotates M

Brilliant. Wish I'd done it. Something will have to be really spectacular to beat this.

Great idea and beautifully developed!

That's amazing! Although I'm not really a fan of the upside-down M for W, and there's some inconsistent styling between K/k and W/w. But great work!

if this one doesn't win, I don't know what else.

This is beautiful work.

@moontr3: One of the three winners will be the one with the most additions to the favorites, so this font has already won this category, I think it has won our hearts.

Like... How? This is unreal my friend, what a absolute gem!

BTW @faux_icing: To get around those distorted fontstruct previews and render "crisp" looking previews straight from your browser, simply adjust zoom level of your browser window.

Ctrl+Mouse Wheel Down   (Make sure to zoom out completely, 30% is max. in Firefox)

This makes everything on the page to appear smaller, but, it also extends the available range of the font size slider in the preview widget. In other words, this now allows rendering a font preview at much larger size before it will no longer fit on the screen.

It basically changes the aspect ratio of the displayed contents (incl. that of the font preview widget box), providing better zoom to size ratios, hence, better rendering quality.

For more info and a visual comparison of the zoom-hack click here:

Number 8 has a tiny hole on its left side. And some of the guidelines are somewhat rough and occasionally don't align. Is this something you will eventually fix?

@Sed4tives good eyes you have to spot that tiny hole. I could only see it whith font size like above 400. On the FS preview page it would not be visible, since to me it seems fonstruct always tries to wrap every brick into separate thin envelope and if there are multiple such over same line, they superimpose and make that area look bloated. (I tried your suggestion with the browser zoom, but could not see any better preview.)

 All my congratulations on this excellent performance! Well done. What a beautiful approach (picture example)

Congratulations on winning the Numbers competition. This font truly deserved it. 

Congrats from the bottom of my heart, dear pal! Superb font and execution.

Congrats from the bottom of my heart, dear pal! Superb font and execution.

Hjb

Excellent work. It was a brave move to include fine curves and thin lines using the crude FS toolset. Congratulations. 10/10

Congrats on the win, this is a really impressive font

Suprised you haven't won a compitition already. I have no idea how you create as smooth of a design as this. anyways, congrats on winning, you deserved it! 10/10

GG tortoiseshell!!

AREN

0 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 0

How?

8

Skhe"mati"que?

skhematique = "in the manner of the nature of a thing"

ELIZABETH

show me a blueprint of the blueprint

this is what u want i guess

@digitalio-2 LMAO

The ARCITECTURE! The CREATIVITY! Just like me!

vs