@architaraz: Thanks a lot, compañero! Some letters of the Cyrillic alphabet still make me somewhat insecure when I approach their construction, you know.
Nice font, I like the Latin part. But there are a couple of mistakes in Cyrillic. И and Й should have a thin middle, remember writing with a broad-nib pen. Ф must have a serif at the top. Д has strange serifs, they rarely differ from each other, as in T (do not forget to compare with Ц Щ). Л usually has a larger curved drop or serif tip. And in this type of font л д should have serifs on the top right. If you are interested in looking at the Cyrillic alphabet, I can recommend fonts of Paratype (they will also publush finalists of Modern Cyrillic at 07/05/2021), Alex Slobzheninov, type.today and type.tomorrow, lettehead.
Very nice fat serif. You've managed to build a sophisticated font using very simple elements. The N should not have a bottom right serif. (Just interesting: at a particular size, there is a pattern, perhaps some sort of interference. Every second word appears to be solid. - I found out the reason: you have set the space at 2 and a quarter bricks. Apart from this, there are further cases of snippets of text that appear to be thicker. I think the cause might be kerning, using fractions. Nothing of this diminishes the usability of your font. Leave everything as is.) 10/10
@Frodo7: You and your dedication to the small (but very important) details. I had always been intrigued by this effect that I saw when testing certain fonts at small sizes, but I had no idea where it came from. Thanks a million for your always kind and highly appreciated comments, Maestro.
@thalamic: Thanks a lot, Maestro. Far from trying to be perfect. The real reason for the vertical stripes was to be able to hide half of the design errors (hehehe ? ). And my oldest son says we saved half on printer ink. All a success, seen that way.
21 Comments
Wonderful! Cyrillic letters are looking pretty nice ;)
@architaraz: Thanks a lot, compañero! Some letters of the Cyrillic alphabet still make me somewhat insecure when I approach their construction, you know.
This font looks pretty nice. I wonder if a version with inverted stripes is possible? (e.g. for 2-color layering)…
@BWM: Thanks, pal. That's a very interesting suggestion. ?
Nice font, I like the Latin part. But there are a couple of mistakes in Cyrillic. И and Й should have a thin middle, remember writing with a broad-nib pen. Ф must have a serif at the top. Д has strange serifs, they rarely differ from each other, as in T (do not forget to compare with Ц Щ). Л usually has a larger curved drop or serif tip. And in this type of font л д should have serifs on the top right. If you are interested in looking at the Cyrillic alphabet, I can recommend fonts of Paratype (they will also publush finalists of Modern Cyrillic at 07/05/2021), Alex Slobzheninov, type.today and type.tomorrow, lettehead.
Very nice fat serif. You've managed to build a sophisticated font using very simple elements. The N should not have a bottom right serif. (Just interesting: at a particular size, there is a pattern, perhaps some sort of interference. Every second word appears to be solid. - I found out the reason: you have set the space at 2 and a quarter bricks. Apart from this, there are further cases of snippets of text that appear to be thicker. I think the cause might be kerning, using fractions. Nothing of this diminishes the usability of your font. Leave everything as is.) 10/10
love the "q"
@Dmitriy Sychiov: Thank you very much for pointing out my flaws in these glyphs. I will try to improve them.
@Frodo7: You and your dedication to the small (but very important) details. I had always been intrigued by this effect that I saw when testing certain fonts at small sizes, but I had no idea where it came from. Thanks a million for your always kind and highly appreciated comments, Maestro.
@smash.buckler: Thanks, pal. I like it too.
@meek: Thank you so much once again for this new, bright and splendid star and mention, dear Chief.
Another really good fonstruction, I love your approach to curves, the angled serifs and the diacrtics in this one!
@four: Thank you very much, dear compa. Your points of view are very important to me, you know that.
Perfect
@thalamic: Thanks a lot, Maestro. Far from trying to be perfect. The real reason for the vertical stripes was to be able to hide half of the design errors (hehehe ? ). And my oldest son says we saved half on printer ink. All a success, seen that way.
Please sign in to comment.