@minimum - I really that like the larger "curved" edges are not "smooth" -- zoomed in, they remind me of stonework or masonry. In fact, the whole font design does. Great work here, top notch. :^)
Every time I look at the glyphs of this font (and others) I start to think that I would have put this corner in a different way, that the lower part of the "e" could be different, that the "u" would be a better "v "and that the mirrored" v "would be a good" u "... Thousands of alternatives. And that's when I ask myself "Why do I make my fonts the way I do?" And that's when the wonder of diversity that FontStruct contains catches me again and makes me applaud that other people do different things than I would. Thank you, minimum for being great and unique. Thank you fontstructors for letting all of us be different.
@Frodo7: I didn't know I had a style, let alone an unmistakable one. Interesting. I guess I think the way I do consistently. Very limiting.
@Goatmeal: I like the chunky-ness too. The stonework effect was unintentional, but it's there nonetheless, yes. I'll try to do a sample for that.
@elmoyenique: You have great way of thinking of glyphs. That is why, I've created a clonable parts version of this font. I would love to see your interpretation of it. Can't wait, actually. Enjoy. :-)
24 Comments
Thanks, elmoyenique
This reminds me of blocks that are used to create pathways in urban cities…
fantastically intricate! 10/10
Wonderful modular font in your unmistakable style. I see grey dots at the white junctions 10/10
@minimum - I really that like the larger "curved" edges are not "smooth" -- zoomed in, they remind me of stonework or masonry. In fact, the whole font design does. Great work here, top notch. :^)
Every time I look at the glyphs of this font (and others) I start to think that I would have put this corner in a different way, that the lower part of the "e" could be different, that the "u" would be a better "v "and that the mirrored" v "would be a good" u "... Thousands of alternatives. And that's when I ask myself "Why do I make my fonts the way I do?" And that's when the wonder of diversity that FontStruct contains catches me again and makes me applaud that other people do different things than I would. Thank you, minimum for being great and unique. Thank you fontstructors for letting all of us be different.
@BWM: Now that you mention it, yes they do. :)
@swash.buckler: Thanks.
@Frodo7: I didn't know I had a style, let alone an unmistakable one. Interesting. I guess I think the way I do consistently. Very limiting.
@Goatmeal: I like the chunky-ness too. The stonework effect was unintentional, but it's there nonetheless, yes. I'll try to do a sample for that.
@elmoyenique: You have great way of thinking of glyphs. That is why, I've created a clonable parts version of this font. I would love to see your interpretation of it. Can't wait, actually. Enjoy. :-)
Congrats on the TP, Master!
An effective combination of black blocks and white lines that also connect the letters and form net-like structures.
Wow! What a pict! ❤️
Very nice stone work.?
@minimum - Now THATsample picture is EXACTLY what I was thinking! :^D
The touch of a true master...
This is some very nice stonework in the sample… I wonder how long that took to create?
This rendering is insanely gorgeous ?
A veeery nice sample! ?
ADOMI8
Please sign in to comment.