I am sure that in the era of constructivism, gopniks did not exist yet, they are rather street children of the 90s, after the collapse of the USSR, when parents had no time to raise their children and the ideology changed to the opposite of the Soviet one. But from the font I want to say that the Latin part looks good, but in the Cyrillic alphabet there is a serious problem with the tails of the Д Ц Щ, which should be shifted to the right. Some letters look too bold, like N И Х У Ж, but for a constructivist typeface that's not a big problem.
1 Comment
I am sure that in the era of constructivism, gopniks did not exist yet, they are rather street children of the 90s, after the collapse of the USSR, when parents had no time to raise their children and the ideology changed to the opposite of the Soviet one. But from the font I want to say that the Latin part looks good, but in the Cyrillic alphabet there is a serious problem with the tails of the Д Ц Щ, which should be shifted to the right. Some letters look too bold, like N И Х У Ж, but for a constructivist typeface that's not a big problem.
Please sign in to comment.