by davidscott

Download disabled

The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.

Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.

If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.

Info: Created on 20th October 2012 . Last edited on 30th November 2012.
License Creative Commons
    Fave Tags:


    Wow! Excellent.
    Comment by V. Sarela (Yautja) 25th November 2012
    Wow, cool font! But a better name, maybe?
    Comment by cablecomputer 25th November 2012
    Very impressive first fontstruction! Such maturity suggests you surely are not a "real" beginner!
    Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 25th November 2012
    Fantastic! - a first FontStruct, but obviously from someone who is already an experienced typographer.

    Welcome to FS :)
    Comment by p2pnut 25th November 2012
    Welcome to FontStruct, the place where dreams come true. :-) Down-to-earth cracked bold stencil. Might the I have too much space around it? Rugged, strong, beautiful. 10/10.
    Comment by demonics 25th November 2012
    Awesome first! I remember MY first fontstruction, it sucked so much I had to delete it. This is an awesome cracked stencil. Welcome to FS! 10/10
    Comment by Noah (winty5) 25th November 2012
    This is what AFT's typefaces would look like if he was interested in creating typefaces. ;-)
    Comment by laynecom 26th November 2012
    @laynecom : i'm not sure i'm understanding well...
    Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 26th November 2012
    @laynecom : and if "Decay" is a beautiful work, it definitely has nothing to do with my approach !
    Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 26th November 2012
    Sorry, what I meant is that FS is a tool for the construction of typefaces in a classical sense. You are more interested in the deconstruction of typefaces, if I'm correct. I'm very well aware that Decay has nothing to do with your work, but that is exactly what I'm saying. :-)
    Comment by laynecom 26th November 2012
    It's not because you have obviously no idea how my fonts are constructed that you can say they are the opposite. If what you say was true i only needed 5 minutes to do it, and not pass sometimes 2 years and hundreds hours of work to "construct" an extremely intricate new style. Don't talk about what you do not know.
    Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 26th November 2012
    Sorry to have offended you. But actually you have no idea about the concept of deconstruction or deconstructivism, although you obviously do it. It's not the same as destructing. Have a look at the Wikipedia article. Deconstructing something requires as much time as constructing something, if not more.
    Comment by laynecom 26th November 2012
    Oh... I see... Sorry layne my poor english had some difficulties to grasp the nuances between "deconstructing", "destructing", and "destroying", now i understand you didn't want any harm, sorry.
    Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 26th November 2012