For me, it was the second sample that inspired my comment on o.
“oldest” reads clearly, but the two “on” pairings – while readable – are not highly legible. I think there could be an improvement. A narrower slice on o can keep it from conflicting too much with u. Here’s a composite example (and some other suggestions):
Thanks all you, pals !
@architaraz, @aphoria, LexKominek, @p2pnut: A lot of thanks for your feedbacks.
@will.i.ૐ: I'm with you and Lex, the "o" must be changed, I'll try it. And thanks for your all excellents suggestions.
14 Comments
Beautiful & Creative
Thanks!
I can visualize an outline version at this same scale.
The o, I believe, would be slightly more successful in the legibility department if it were rotated 180° or flipped vertically.
Great work :-) !
Especially when seen in the sample, I have no problem with the legibility of the 'o'. 10/10
“oldest” reads clearly, but the two “on” pairings – while readable – are not highly legible. I think there could be an improvement. A narrower slice on o can keep it from conflicting too much with u. Here’s a composite example (and some other suggestions):
@architaraz, @aphoria, LexKominek, @p2pnut: A lot of thanks for your feedbacks.
@will.i.ૐ: I'm with you and Lex, the "o" must be changed, I'll try it. And thanks for your all excellents suggestions.
Please sign in to comment.