453222

5 Comments

Another good option for me. It works on most glyphs, but there are others where reading is a little bit difficult and could be improved (G/U/D/m/n/o/u/...).

Comment by elmoyenique 24th march 2021

Well, smooth reading is not really my priority. :) Primarily, I push forward a concept without being too much concerned about what will be the outcome. I would not mind even if it would be much less readable. Most of all, I am curious what the initial font can withstand. And the margin between "legible" and "asemic writing" is my ultimate goal.

Comment by jirinvk 24th march 2021

Thanks for the explanatory comment. I think I understand what you want to do and I understand your experimentation work. Mine are only opinions of a person who moves in a much more classical perspective about my own FS. I admire the new things I see here at FS, even though I never try to repeat them. Keep doing them, please.

Comment by elmoyenique 24th march 2021

Despite I have this destructive/deconstructive urge, I admire many classical fonts as well. And despite my comments are sparse, I admire what you do! And ofc I admire Beate, four, etc.

Comment by jirinvk 24th march 2021

All very cool work!

Comment by Alefantone 9th september 2022

Also of Interest

Fontself

Make your fonts on iPad

GlyphsApp

Get the world’s leading font editor for OSX.

More from the Gallery

epetytyAAJ36iby jirinvk
floriitutaBN50iby jirinvk
bulbambulAN3630iby jirinvk
choruchorAB18by jirinvk
Hooliganby afrojet
Switchboardby four
je suiz charlie by elmoyenique
Parisienneby jffry101

From the Blog

News

Color Competition Results

News

Color Competition