(unofficial)

@NewCurvenBig - Unless the FontStructor is claiming their logofont is an "official" version, is it REALLY necessary to seek out logofonts for the sole purpose of stating they are obviously "unofficial" ?...  :^\

Ok 🐐🍽️

@Goatmeal: This has nothing to do with even the most badly-made unofficial "Into/Beyond the Spider-Verse" font. Maybe it's because the FontStructor claims they're official, but they didn't obviously have contact with Marvel Studios. So, it's unofficial.

@NewCurvenBig - Unless they have since been deleted, I don't see anywhere this FontStructor "claims" any of their fonts to be "official," so again, stating the obvious seems a tad unnecessary.  And the use of names in tags is for reference, not endorsement; they help fellow font enthusiasts find designs that may be of interest.  I've certainly done the same for my "unofficial" fan-made logofonts.  ;^)

@Goatmeal: Well, some people may think it's official, so I made this disclaimer.

Also, they do not look like the official logo fonts.

@NewCurvenBig - (1.) some people may think it's an "official" logofont, yet (2.) they do not look like the "official" logofonts.  But if they don't look like the "official" logofonts, then why would some people think they are "official" ?

@Goatmeal: Because those people only trust by words instead of the font itself. :^/

@NewCurvenBig - Let's just say I have a little more faith in my fellow FontStructors and those who visit FontStruct.  ;^)  What can I say?  I'm an optimist.

@Goatmeal: Yes! Me too!