I like how you've married the Roman and Hebrew glyph shapes. If this had been a Roman-only font I'd say the m, w, æ ought to be wider, but then you'd loose the connection with the Hebrew letters. I can easily see this being used e.g. in a bilingual logotype. The new Ff, Jj, Ll, Xx are better than in the first version -- although I think you might preserve the lowercase fjl as distinct letterforms.
1 Comment
Please sign in to comment.