Sorry to break it to you, but that's a pixel display.

HE CLONED WITH OUT CHANGING!!!!!!

@Tv boy aero (digitalio-2) - Look again.  He modified the numerals.

It seems there´s a minimal change... but is that even OK?

@ACoolShapeFontMaker i think that, if it is 15%-80% changed it should be valid

323/(5/100 which is 20)=16, 16*3=48 glyphs changed, added, removed.

only 10 glyphs have been changed, making this potentially not ok.

i know that this is subjectiv

@ACoolShapeFontMaker - A change is a change, no matter how minimal.  Like it or not, this is the risk where cloning is allowed (clones with no changes or minimal changes).

@everyone exactly

@ACoolShapeFontMaker: Yes