The ‘a’ is interesting aesthetically with its corners chamfered smaller than the diagonal that joins the right stem.
Using that as the basis, perhaps the ‘f’ is too wide, as is the ‘z’ and the ‘t’. The non-descending parts of ‘g’ and ‘y’ could perhaps work better if they sat at the baseline, which is not quite possible in the very large x-height used. Also, the pointy base of the ‘v’ and ‘w’ are breaking the style established by the rest.
I've tweaked a couple of letterforms and am still making adjustments to this version and the superwide version. (Also working on a bold version, but it's not ready to be released yet.)
3 Comments
The ‘a’ is interesting aesthetically with its corners chamfered smaller than the diagonal that joins the right stem.
Using that as the basis, perhaps the ‘f’ is too wide, as is the ‘z’ and the ‘t’. The non-descending parts of ‘g’ and ‘y’ could perhaps work better if they sat at the baseline, which is not quite possible in the very large x-height used. Also, the pointy base of the ‘v’ and ‘w’ are breaking the style established by the rest.
Visually appealing, nonetheless.
Really cool.
I've tweaked a couple of letterforms and am still making adjustments to this version and the superwide version. (Also working on a bold version, but it's not ready to be released yet.)
Please sign in to comment.