Advertisements

Details

Description:
-
Stats:
47 characters, 9 downloads
Created:
Sat, 16th April, 2:08 PM 2011
Last Edit:
Sat, 11th February, 10:34 PM 2012
Tags:
Rate it:
  • Currently 8.34864
8.3Balanced%20Rating%3A%20%3Cb%20class%3D%22weighted_value%22%3E8.3%3C%2Fb%3E%3Cbr%2F%3EAverage%20Rating%3A%20%3Cb%20class%3D%22rating_value%22%3E9.2%3C%2Fb%3E%3Cbr%2F%3EClick%20for%20more%20information%20about%20this%20rating. 6 votes
sign in to vote.
Shared:

Discussion

truth14ful
truth14ful Thu, 21st April, 2011

Good font, but the "a" looks a little bit like an "o".


LexKominek
LexKominek Sat, 21st January, 2012

Other than the 'g' and 'q' being identical, I really like this.

Also, consider thickening the 'z' diagonal a bit at the top. Not sure if it would work, but it might :-)


Agent Demonic Ladybug
Agent Demonic Ladybug Mon, 23rd January, 2012

Any suggestions for q/g?


CMunk
CMunk Mon, 23rd January, 2012

You could do a double storey g. Or q could be an o with a central decender (like a small cap Q).


CMunk
CMunk Mon, 23rd January, 2012

You could do a double storey g. Or q could be an o with a central decender (like a small cap Q).


djnippa
djnippa Mon, 23rd January, 2012


djnippa
djnippa Mon, 23rd January, 2012


djnippa
djnippa Mon, 23rd January, 2012

A few suggestions for 'g' & one for 'z'.
Do you think that the middle stem of 'k' should be more centralised, like the 'x'?.


djnippa
djnippa Mon, 23rd January, 2012

Also a suggestion for the dot above 'i' & 'j'.

Also a suggestion for the dot above 'i' & 'j'.

Agent Demonic Ladybug
Agent Demonic Ladybug Tue, 24th January, 2012

djnippa, you really don't have to keep doing this for me. Thank you so much.

(i actually like i j k how they are.)


djnippa
djnippa Wed, 25th January, 2012

Sorry, I can't help it. It's in my nature. Take from it what you will.
You did ask "any suggestions for q & g?"
Now I realise that you don't like it. I will refrain from assisting you.

Although I'm glad you changed the k & z.
I'm not feelin' the new 'g'. It doesn't seem to fit. It looks like a reversed "C4 Font" g.
Also in reference to i & j. I think without the dot, they are very minimal. Where as the rest of the font doesn't have the same vertical minimalism.
I'd like to see your uppercase. I think that's the real challenge.


Agent Demonic Ladybug
Agent Demonic Ladybug Wed, 25th January, 2012

Hey, I'm sorry! You don't have to "refrain from assisting" me just because I didn't follow your tip. I asked for suggestions, yes, but that's not a guarantee that I'll use them. If I don't use your suggestions,

1) that doesn't mean I don't like them, and

2) you can always clone any of my fonts and change them to how you like them.
Anytime.

And thank you so much for helping me these multiple times. I am very grateful.

And I DO like your g! I just don't quite think it fits this font. Neither does mine, of course, but I'm working on it. I'll change i j.


zinfont
zinfont Fri, 27th January, 2012


Agent Demonic Ladybug
Agent Demonic Ladybug Fri, 27th January, 2012

@ zinfont What is that?


truth14ful
truth14ful Sat, 11th February, 2012

One possibility might be to leave g and q identical. They will still work in context, just like I and l in some sans fonts. Another solution could be to let the g extend more than the p and q. This would look OK because the g has a hook, which needs more descender space than a p or q, kind of like my f in Savant Garde.