Redacted |
|
Add Favorite |
by DaveCameron
Details |
Discussion |
I don't get it. Rectangles?
I guess the redactions are the character weight which the Gubmint has deemed obscene.
Redacted |
|
Add Favorite |
by DaveCameron
Details |
Discussion |
I don't get it. Rectangles?
I guess the redactions are the character weight which the Gubmint has deemed obscene.
The best i have seen in a long while at fontstruct.
Says everything.
10 points by me.
@ minimum - this is hard to minimalize, down, under below ...
A hidden gem of early fontstructing. Minimalism taken to the extreme. It's not the most legible font, perhaps, but the spacing is perfect.
An old motto comes to my mind: You can not not communicate.
???
How on Earth do u read this??
@prototype: ur SO weird! :)
???
How are you supposed to read it?
-Mairi
I really like this, but I think the spaces and gaps should be black too, otherwise it's kinda revealing. This is pure brilliance though. The best part in my opinion is that this font still has real information stored as letters, meaning everything written with it can be decoded by simply changing the font. This is especially useful for when you want to write up a classified document digitally without having to swap out the information with meaningless boxes... Just change the font and boom!
Of course, you'll have to stop people from being able to copy-paste the text, but that's not too hard.

We celebrate five years of FontStruct with an experimental new feature.