@winty5 : are you writing to minidonut, or to me ?-))
{I first thought you were talking to me, even in a harsh way, since you quoted me, put a controversal assertion, a 'sad' word, and you already commented… (in short, it's ambiguous, without the expected '@' this time…) :-/}
Anyway, knowing that 'µ' reads as 'micro', 'µpixel' stands for 'micropixel'. I just compare what is intentionally titled (and tagged by the author ?) to be compared. Besides, IMO (wich is a specialized one IMHO), uppercased letters that can fit (mainly) into a 3x4 grid correspond to what I'd describe (even define) as a micro font (because of all mathematical possibilities - 4'096 here, that's beginning to be a lot, compared to 3x3). Therefore, quite logically, minidonut's 'µpixel' font, with his look of 3x5 grid (many of his uppercase letters have this size - and many micro fonts have only this set of characters), could indeed be compared, being on a knife-edge. But since there are a lot of smaller fonts, I had to limit myself.
“Mikropix”
> This reminded, winty5, where is this (lame) font you hate(d) ??? A link, please, since it may have been renamed, even removed in the meantime (for some reason…), and I'd need to see by myself [in a world where tastes may differ, and opinions could change too, when all the elements are gathered objectively]…
Ahh ! I get it ! *ashamed*
But it was quite confusing,
from an external viewpoint…
1. minidonut misspelled the font name : Mikropix
2. winty5 did not provide the full name : Mikropix
3. none of both members provided a LINK 4. winty5 depreciated his font as some flattery
5. logically, winty5 should delete immediately his 'stinky' font of yours,
and I won't post there because of deadly 'µBS' ;-)
FS is becoming a playground… LOL
---
PS.
@demonics & @Umbreon126 :
Thank you, hyperactive members !
(demonics misspelled)
(Umbreon126 misspelled)
(I'll misspell too ;-))
11 Comments
I enjoy the effort
and the logic in it.
B.t.w. I won't compare it to smaller fonts. (I.e. where a smaller grid applies to ALL the characters.)
{I first thought you were talking to me, even in a harsh way, since you quoted me, put a controversal assertion, a 'sad' word, and you already commented… (in short, it's ambiguous, without the expected '@' this time…) :-/}
Anyway, knowing that 'µ' reads as 'micro', 'µpixel' stands for 'micropixel'. I just compare what is intentionally titled (and tagged by the author ?) to be compared. Besides, IMO (wich is a specialized one IMHO), uppercased letters that can fit (mainly) into a 3x4 grid correspond to what I'd describe (even define) as a micro font (because of all mathematical possibilities - 4'096 here, that's beginning to be a lot, compared to 3x3). Therefore, quite logically, minidonut's 'µpixel' font, with his look of 3x5 grid (many of his uppercase letters have this size - and many micro fonts have only this set of characters), could indeed be compared, being on a knife-edge. But since there are a lot of smaller fonts, I had to limit myself.
“Mikropix”
> This reminded, winty5, where is this (lame) font you hate(d) ???
A link, please, since it may have been renamed, even removed in the meantime (for some reason…), and I'd need to see by myself [in a world where tastes may differ, and opinions could change too, when all the elements are gathered objectively]…
But it was quite confusing,
from an external viewpoint…
1. minidonut misspelled the font name : Mikropix
2. winty5 did not provide the full name : Mikropix
3. none of both members provided a LINK
4. winty5 depreciated his font as some flattery
5. logically, winty5 should delete immediately his 'stinky' font of yours,
and I won't post there because of deadly 'µBS' ;-)
FS is becoming a playground… LOL
---
PS.
@demonics & @Umbreon126 :
Thank you, hyperactive members !
(demonics misspelled)
(Umbreon126 misspelled)
(I'll misspell too ;-))
“2. winty5 did not provide the full name : 5Mikropix”
Why do you imagine such difficult names ?
8°)
{now in the corner, with a microdonut in the pocket}
Please sign in to comment.