@NZWStudios2024: I agree with @Beate. This font(?) seems to be in its early stages: few glyphs, no consistency... What part of it do you think as "nice"? FS users frequently post glowing reviews and commentary on fonts that lack originality or effort, and are often mere clones of previous ones. At the same time, it neglects the truly intense work with an excellent typographic approach that some dedicated FontStructors demonstrate here. It's a shame, at least for me, and I think @Beate's comment is in line with that, IMHO.
3 Comments
Nice
NZWStudios2024:
Why? Because it was made with FontStruct?
@NZWStudios2024: I agree with @Beate. This font(?) seems to be in its early stages: few glyphs, no consistency... What part of it do you think as "nice"? FS users frequently post glowing reviews and commentary on fonts that lack originality or effort, and are often mere clones of previous ones. At the same time, it neglects the truly intense work with an excellent typographic approach that some dedicated FontStructors demonstrate here. It's a shame, at least for me, and I think @Beate's comment is in line with that, IMHO.
Please sign in to comment.