I repeat what I once said to frongile: I like this woodcutter style, it gives a lot of personality to the font. I would really enjoy seeing it completed. He doesn't do it, but would you finish it?
@Peter (Petruuccio): That's what I was talking about. Perfect for me. What do you think about building the & with parts of the G and the 3 as I show you?
@Elmoyenique Thanks for reminding me and also for good tip, I was thinking a while about the & just before I decided to take a break from this font :-)
I bumped into a compatibility/consistence issue on the diacritics. While dot above i in form of whole width section looks nice and natural, on other glyphs it looks weird and I automatically used dots. Does anybody have idea how to solve it universally?
12 Comments
I repeat what I once said to frongile: I like this woodcutter style, it gives a lot of personality to the font. I would really enjoy seeing it completed. He doesn't do it, but would you finish it?
@Elmoyenique, if you mean adding accented characters - yes, if you mean other alphabets - maybe.
@Peter (Petruuccio): That's what I was talking about. Perfect for me. What do you think about building the & with parts of the G and the 3 as I show you?
Btw, the tilde (~) is missing on the ã.
@Elmoyenique Thanks for reminding me and also for good tip, I was thinking a while about the & just before I decided to take a break from this font :-)
I bumped into a compatibility/consistence issue on the diacritics. While dot above i in form of whole width section looks nice and natural, on other glyphs it looks weird and I automatically used dots. Does anybody have idea how to solve it universally?
One suggestion: don't change your diacritics, just modify the dot on the i.
Sorry, wrong image.
Please sign in to comment.