I've already gotten into another mess. Again a "2-in-1" font. It may work as is, but if you want to convert it to a script one you have to use some connectors between the letters, placed in the glyphs <, >, \, [, ], {, }. You must try each of them between two characters because there are many possible combinations. I add some samples down here. Don't worry and be patient, please, the result is worth it. Oh well, the actual "</>" glyphs are finally in the "©/™". To see all working, copy and paste the following sentence in the User Input window, please: Th>e q>u>i>c}k b[r{o[w[n f>o[x j{u]m]p\s o[v{e[r t]h>e l>a{zy d>o{g.
18 Comments
I've already gotten into another mess. Again a "2-in-1" font. It may work as is, but if you want to convert it to a script one you have to use some connectors between the letters, placed in the glyphs <, >, \, [, ], {, }. You must try each of them between two characters because there are many possible combinations. I add some samples down here. Don't worry and be patient, please, the result is worth it. Oh well, the actual "</>" glyphs are finally in the "©/™". To see all working, copy and paste the following sentence in the User Input window, please: Th>e q>u>i>c}k b[r{o[w[n f>o[x j{u]m]p\s o[v{e[r t]h>e l>a{zy d>o{g.
@elmoyenique - What a wonderful set of expansion characters! They really add to the versatility of this design. :^) I would venture to say that not every letter in a word needs to be "only" connected or "only" separated; combining separate and connected letters in individual words would result in innumerable unique combinations.
Dear @Goatmeal: Thanks a million once again for your continued support and encouraging comments. You're right in your tight appraisals, as usual. Not all the letters must be connected (in addition, that would require a much greater number of specific connectors), and in fact there are pairs of them that it's practically impossible to join them and they are frankly better with a small separation. This is a curious subject, and a real mess in which I have gotten myself and from which I have tried to get out as well as possible. It started with a "What if...?" and it still hasn't stopped. Thanks again for understanding, compañero.
@elmoyenique - Sometimes those "What if...?" questions make the best "messes" ! :^D
@meek: Thanks a million for this new TP, dear Boss!
That s is beautiful and the z is amazing.
@thalamic: Thank you very much, master! About s and z, glad you like it. Sometimes we must try new and a bit risky shapes.
What a great concept. I love how this gives the person working with it a lot of options.
@four: Thank you for your always kind comments. I would have liked to be able to simplify it so that it had fewer connectors (3 or 4 at most).
How did you get the curves?
Please sign in to comment.