The black style is interesting (though not on all glyphs). Several (US-ASCII) symbols are missing (allowing fewer contexts). I don't know about the horizontal spacing (it might need to be fixed since it shows a blurring at the minimal size in the previewer). Nice ij kerning (why ., too? - I did not check for more surprises). I can archive this set of characters, and I may review it or not in the future (because it's not extremely small (only based on 3x6+ with 4 x-height) and not a strict 3-dot of width (MWmw ANQ)). Funny pun in the title, Rancy! ;-)
1 Comment
The black style is interesting (though not on all glyphs). Several (US-ASCII) symbols are missing (allowing fewer contexts). I don't know about the horizontal spacing (it might need to be fixed since it shows a blurring at the minimal size in the previewer). Nice ij kerning (why ., too? - I did not check for more surprises). I can archive this set of characters, and I may review it or not in the future (because it's not extremely small (only based on 3x6+ with 4 x-height) and not a strict 3-dot of width (MWmw ANQ)). Funny pun in the title, Rancy! ;-)
Please sign in to comment.