1. The characters need to be a consistent height & width

2. The characters need to be consistent in style.

To the person who rated 1/10 most of this series. It seems to be a class of very young kids. It's silly and will not help to bring them confidence in themselves.

To T.Petrone who seems to be their professor : It's surely good to push them to more structure & cohesion, but i think the embryos of more creative and less classical approaches must be treated differently, there's not only HELVETICA in the Typography galaxy, and you can elaborate cohesive styles based on polymorphism. For instance, i like the intention in this one despite immaturity, you can use typography to develop little "worlds" being eventually used to form "words". This one is more going in this direction in my opinion. To better understand my purpose, check up my own Fonts page