<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Favorite FontStructions from Sirayne  (sirayne1) (Sorted by Sharing Date)</title>
    <description>Fontstructions from FontStruct.com</description>
    <link>http://fontstruct.com</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Ninja Gaiden (Small) (Game Gear)” by Patrick H. Lauke (redux)]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=69ab8115&id=2714546&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Recreation of the small pixel font from Tecmo/Sega's "Ninja Gaiden" (1991) on the Sega Game Gear.</p>

<p>Only the characters present in the game's tile set have been included.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2714546/ninja-gaiden-small-game-gear</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Locks” by Murilo Lima ABC]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=687d85d0&id=2714191&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>This is my font Locks, Greek and Coptic Version Coming Soon.</p>

<p>Essa é minha fonte Locks, Versão Grego e Copta Em Breve.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2714191/locks-2</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Bōblox 04 C” by Ronelious Lome]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=689584ae&id=2702126&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2702126/boblox-04-7</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“zanussian eYe/FS/С” by Dmitriy Sychiov (Sychoff)]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=68d40c83&id=2694821&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2694821/zanussian-eye-fs-28</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“oxygene 1 cyrillic” by BroDadi]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=687da3af&id=2593120&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>font from geometry dash (caps only, no icons or whatever on lowercase because i don't remember which icons are where and don't know where to put the russian ones)</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2593120/oxygene-1-cyrillic</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“YukariMobile” by ZEkA10000]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=687da3b4&id=2691978&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Some time ago I found this font (https://fontmeme.com/fonts/yukarimobile-font/) but here all letters are in Italic and had only basic Latin. Here is an improved version of the font.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2691978/yukarimobile</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“G1 BattleGraf” by geneus1]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a38891e&id=2690254&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>This.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2690254/battlegraff-bk-1</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 06:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Ro11up (Fontstruct ver)” by Dmitry Taranov (eighto)]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=687da3c9&id=155430&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Inspired by&nbsp;graffiti rollup&nbsp;letter&nbsp;shapes. Perhaps there will be some tweaking and additional code pages&nbsp;later.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/155430/ro11up-fontstruct-ver</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 20:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Bitsblot Tall” by IJriccan]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6996aef0&id=2678868&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>A taller and decorated variant to the original body version of Bitsbloton, with minor spacing editions and&nbsp;143&nbsp;new diacritic/letter additions + Cyrillic!</p>

<p></p>

<p>More heavily inspired by the Power of Potluck ENA webseries font. Not a recreation.</p>

<p></p>

<p>Use for whatever you like, enjoy! Credit would be&nbsp;appreciated.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2678868/bitsblot-tall</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Venera” by IronClaws]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a11552b&id=2642263&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Thanks to <a href="https://fontstruct.com/fontstructors/1502220/sed4tives" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Sed4tives</a> for <a href="https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/1657091/stf-faux-bezier-rotunds" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">STF_FAUX BEZIER ROTUNDS</a></p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2642263/venera-6</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“zUpixel 3D eYe/FS” by elmoyenique]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a3a9bdc&id=2587390&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Inspired by <a href="https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/1074400/invasion_block" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">INVASION BLOCK</a> (by the great Upixel), but right slanted, with more glyphs added (206 in total) and some of the originals slightly retouched.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2587390/zupixel-3d-eye-fs</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“FS WE WANT TO RUN” by moontr3]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a0a56f2&id=2492924&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>inspired.... by a frums song with the same name.</p>

<p>too lazy to make punctuation and these other symbols, though they are planned in the future.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2492924/fs-we-want-to-run</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“hiero's glyph” by caterpillar's.kimono]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a2742b9&id=2466555&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>a sneaky little deco font with numbers hidden throughout~</p>

<p>(almost forgot to publish)</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2466555/hieros-glyph</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“skhematique” by tortoiseshell]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a4a9228&id=2465193&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Had quite a bit of fun with this blueprint inspired font for the competition, numbers have been incorporated to best measure glyph length, angles and so forth. Please enjoy~</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2465193/skhematique</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 05:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“zombriya eYe/FS” by elmoyenique]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a3b5afa&id=2469444&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Soft and rounded NUMBERS like long fairground balloons... and shadowed. The first was the 8 and then all the others arrived.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2469444/zombriya-eye-fs</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“db Monuck” by beate]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a2d5f9c&id=2469413&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>My note: db Monuck is NOT a color font. When creating the font, I had created different versions in different layers, which can no longer be deleted. &nbsp;Now, despite everything, the note "Color Font" appears, although it is not.</p>

<p>Please can someone help me to solve the problem?&nbsp;<br />
—<br />
Many thanks for your help, the problem has been solved. ☼&nbsp;<br />
—</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2469413/db-monuck</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 15:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“STF_BEACH RESORT” by Sed4tives]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a0b3e79&id=2370672&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p><strong>BEACH RESORT — </strong><em>1920s Art-Deco style</em><br />
<strong>═══════════════════════════════════</strong><br />
<strong>Beach Resort</strong> is a tall geometric display sans inspired by the Art-Deco aesthetics.</p>

<p>It's condensed style makes up for a rather tall and narrow looking letter concept. The design is further characterized by this distinct asymmetric curve geometry. A tiny touch of stress was added on the vertical axis to create this gentle stroke contrast. The stressed weight of the horizontals automatically compensating it's optical correction issue.</p>

<p><em>— Only minimal kerning for now, more will be added soon</em></p>

<p><strong>Hope y'all like it,</strong></p>

<p>Cheers</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2370672/stf-beach-resort</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Neue Dublin” by Ptles]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=69ed0878&id=2354629&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>The font on the Irish Series B Banknotes.</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2354629/neue-dublin</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“STF_VOLLE BUISJES” by Sed4tives]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a3c9e70&id=2338770&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p><strong>VOLLE BUISJES — </strong><em>Geometric sans-serif style</em><br />
<strong>═══════════════════════════════════</strong><br />
<strong>[ INTRODUCTION ]</strong><br />
This font had derived and materialized from my previous FontStruction called <a href="https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2336602/stf-buisjes-1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Buisjes</strong></a>, and had innitially been planned to be made into this <em><strong>“solid”</strong></em>-style instance that would've then were to be combined and included to the original master font. That idea was later canceled when I decided not to make this part of the <em><strong>“Buisjes”</strong></em>-typeface.<br />
<em><strong>I still went on completed it though, but I was now simply treating it as this unrelated new font instead.</strong></em><br />
The original <em><strong>“outlined”</strong></em>-variant still stood testimony in this second stage of development, as it served as the global basic backbone for this. But, since it now no longer was bound by accurate representation I could start utilize more dynamic sculpting techniques and make minute adjustments that incnclude some optical corrections, as well as implementing a slight more polished looking geometry.</p>

<p></p>

<p><strong>[ TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ]</strong><br />
I took a clone from <em><strong>“Buisjes” </strong></em>and started modifing it into this new solid style. What I basically did was utilizing the <em><strong>“</strong></em><strong><em>brick swap</em></strong><em><strong>”</strong></em>-method in the FS-editor to replace every brick inside the font's <em><strong>“My Bricks”</strong></em>-palette. By doing so, essentially converting the font <em><strong>one-brick-at-a-time </strong></em>into this <strong>1 : 1 </strong>conversion of its source without making any additional changes to the actual glyph-contours.</p>

<p>After a while due to some undesirable result that came from replacing the original bricks the design took a different turn when I started realizing that making an exact <strong>1 : 1</strong>&nbsp; conversion into this solid style wouldn't generate the most desirable looking font. This new solid version that was rendered from the <em><strong>“brick swap”</strong></em>-process seemed to have several optical complications, that when compared to the original outline version, had quite the different effect on its physical properties as well as the aesthetic quality of the letterforms, and had far less visual appeal. These newly presented optical misfortune also had a direct negative effect on the font's legibility. In oder to gain a better understanding as to why it took a toll on legibility some additional thing needs to be explained first, to make sense of it all later. This explains in short the visual effect of added contrast that comes from that <em><strong>“bi-linear”</strong></em>-characteristic nature of the outline version, which employs so much more emphasis to the font's overall geometric properties of various form, and therefor to the contour shape of a glyph. In return this has a direct impact on the overall effectiveness of these forms.</p>

<p>The reduction of this additional contrast within the font's <em><strong>“positive vs. negative”</strong></em>-whitespace balance for the solid version results in a letterform that has a rather weak representation of its several typographic components as well as for each of the individual letter-parts that form a whole, which also help to distinguish one letter from another. In simple words this means that a solid style lacks a lot of that emphasis that is present in the the original outline version, and makes for a far less pleasant and effective font.</p>

<p>Another issue I had with the <strong>1 : 1</strong> identical conversion was the unanticipated but pretty drastic deterioration of its initial <em><strong>“wow”</strong></em>-factor in the solid version that was generated. No longer beneficiary from additional added value that came with a more <em><strong>“decorative”</strong></em>-characteristic that&nbsp; is present within a outlined glyph contour. Also the <em><strong>“bi-linear”</strong></em>-nature of the outlined letters sort of gave the impression it was putting double the emphasis to the typographic parts and the geometric properties that make up each letterform. The rather squarish <em><strong>“box”</strong></em>-like characteristics of the lettering became much more evident in the solid glyph face. Shifting visual focus from the previously more ornate display attraction away towards this more <strong><em>“mechanical”</em></strong>-style that is this rather plain and somewhat shallow looking flat faced letter.</p>

<p>All of these were things that worked out just fine in the font's outlined version, but not so much in terms of a solid <strong><em>“filled”</em></strong>-like style.</p>

<p><br />
Here are some of the things that cause trouble within an exact&nbsp; <strong>1 : 1</strong>&nbsp; conversion into solid bricks:</p>

<p><strong>&nbsp;• Enclosed typographic elements render much thicker than what is considered “acceptable”</strong><br />
<em>(requires optical correction) &nbsp;</em></p>

<p><strong>&nbsp;• Diacritics render too thick and often too big</strong><br />
<em>(requires a complete re-design) &nbsp;</em></p>

<p><strong>&nbsp;• Radius of FontStruct's default solid circle arc connection brick is too small</strong><br />
<em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ‣ Making a solid font constructed from these to look compressed<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ‣ Arc intersection point not sitting deep enough</em><br />
<strong>&nbsp;• Reduced emphasis in depth of geometric form</strong><br />
<em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ‣ Simple rather <strong>“feature-less” </strong>and <strong>“squarish”</strong>-looking geometry</em><br />
<em>(both requires numerous custom composite bricks in order to break-away from these constraints)</em></p>

<p><br />
— The combination of the above in terms of the appropriate adjustments required to make optical corrections in order for it to have balanced proportions will have such significant impact to certain aspects of the physical presentation of the letterforms that they no longer share that seamless overlapping cohesion, and it couldn't really classify any longer as being this solid / filled style instance to the original master font.</p>

<p><strong>That wasn't all (LOL) but yeah I'm done typing for now!</strong></p>

<p>Hope you like it, more info follows..</p>

<p>Cheers</p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2338770/stf-volle-buisjes</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 04:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“STF_VAN NELLE (Blueprint)” by Sed4tives]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a3cf2ca&id=2312820&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p><strong>VAN NELLE (Blueprint) — </strong><em>Geometric modernist sans</em><br />
<strong>═══════════════════════════════════</strong></p>

<p><strong>☛ THE SOURCE</strong><br />
A re-interpretation of the 1926 geometric sans serif alphabet system reproduction by <strong>Jacob Jongert</strong>, published in a 1930 sourcebook by N.J. van de Vecht. The geometric uppercase set of the alphabet system is what would later become the famous sans serif capitals which he used for lettering throughout many of his <strong>Van Nelle</strong> materials.</p>

<p><strong>☛ THE FONTSTRUCTION</strong><br />
Attempt at making a convincing recap of the original alphabet by Jacob Jongert as it was shown in the 1930s sourcebook, and extrapolate that into a full functional font. The decision to go with a small grid sparked a number of limitations in terms of the design freedom that forced some inevitable changes. But the general idea sort of became not to make it a revival, but rather more or less a faithful revision. One that would still be instantly recognizable yet didn't necessarily had to be all about accuracy.</p>

<p><strong>☛ —<em>The small grid design made sure this wasn't happening anyway! </em></strong></p>

<p>But, for instance, the most striking difference between the two fonts (their weight) in fact is such a byproduct for one of those limitations. Something FS's small grid couldn't properly reproduce, so <strong>VAN NELLE (Blueprint)</strong> has a slight stronger weight, making the font somewhat of a bold style version of the original. This in addition provided me with slight extra freedom to inplement a little personal touch for further manicure of the font's finer details. Which allowed me to cope with some of the optical clunkiness that come with a fatter face and the grid based design.</p>

<p>Besides these circumstantial differences, which were basically beyond my control, I've also made some intentional changes to make the typeface more practical to use. The changes include things like the significantly lowered ascender height, the slight different width for certain letters, larger tittle (dot above i, j &amp; ĳ), and several more. despite these changes I believe it very much still reflects what Jongerts once invisioned for the system.</p>

<p><strong>☛ SOME NOTES ON THE ORIGINAL AND ITS CREATOR</strong><br />
<strong>Jacob Jongert</strong> <em>(1883-1942)</em> was a advertising designer from the Netherlands. After varied studies, including being Roland Holst’s assistant and an acquaintance and colleague of S. H. de Roos [who brought the Arts &amp; Crafts ideas of William Morris to the Netherlands and devoted his career to book design and typography] with whom Jongert experimented with several printing techniques and discovered graphic design as his ideal art form.<br />
¶ In 1923 Jongert rolled in a unique and long-term collaboration with the Van Nelle company, where he became head designer, a position he held until 1940. The Van Nelle company had an extremely modern approach towards advertising (they even commissioned Cassandre to do a poster) and Jongert created for the firm a recognizable image with clear shapes, powerful letters and primary colours, totally Dutch avant-garde in style, and with a strict and rigorous approach directly linked to De Stijl principles. The corporate identity he created has become a milestone in the design world.<br />
¶ The lettering, however, is the driving force that ties it all together. The style is a straightforward set of plain, mono-linear, sans serif capitals in a style that just started to come into fashion in the late 1920s, early 1930s with the rise of functionalism and geometric type design. Yet, while these ideas were already thrown out there, its clever simplicity plus the systematic and cohesive way Jongert implemented his lettering was unusual at the time. The square and minimal construction of the forms allowed the letters to contract and expand to fit any situation, yet maintain a consistent and recognizable appearance throughout the Van Nelle line. ¶ Something we only recently have learned to appreciate is to see his hand crafted system amid the current advancements in variable-font technology, which offers a similar kind of flexibility to typeface designs. A quality that certainly placed him well ahead of its time.</p>

<p>What I particulary like about Jongert's original is the stuff that is going on in the lowercase set of the alphabet, which are those quirky lowercase letter inventions that are different from the more traditional modernist sans, but sadly the lowercase letters were pretty much never used in his works.</p>

<p>I created a simple PDF typeface specimen for those who want to see the high-resolution preview.</p>

<p><a href="https://issuu.com/ronruedisueli/docs/_van_nelle_blueprint_specimen" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>VAN NELLE (Blueprint) Typeface Specimen</strong></a> - <em>(Issuu)</em></p>

<p><strong>​​</strong>Thats all Folks <strong>☚</strong></p>

<p><strong>☛ Cheers</strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2312820/stf-van-nelle-blueprint</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
