250431
Published: 18th February, 2014
Last edited: 4th March, 2014
Created: 11th February, 2014
The design was inspired by the Art Deco era typefaces and architecture. While constructed with simple shapes, it is strong, bold, stylistic, and commands attention. Created in Des Moines, this is Des Deco.
550981
Published: 29th July, 2012
Last edited: 29th July, 2012
Created: 15th July, 2012
Cloned from dasuser's Deep Dish (based on the Mac font Chicago) and made it clean. I got the name 'Vado' from when I read the label on a pocket camcorder in my school.
You are free to clone this, I would particularly like to see one that has more glyphs.
Enjoy the font!
from FontBlastThis is a clone of Deep Dish
491272
Published: 13th February, 2009
Last edited: 16th March, 2009
Created: 13th February, 2009
For use with Bloc: http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/149998This is a clone of Bloc
252271
Published: 13th February, 2009
Last edited: 16th March, 2009
Created: 13th February, 2009
Use together with Bloc Striped for delicious results: http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/150031
222101618
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 16th December, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
16119814
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd November, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
1371988
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd October, 2009
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
976312138
Published: 25th May, 2008
Last edited: 23rd June, 2009
Created: 25th May, 2008
Caps from WPA Gothic in a low-waisted "deco" style.This is a clone of WPA Gothic
902141
Published: 25th April, 2024
Last edited: 21st September, 2014
Created: 9th September, 2014
A sort of old-fashioned font with dashed broad strokes on the upper-case letters