232145519
Published: 30th April, 2009
Last edited: 24th June, 2009
Created: 29th April, 2009
2x2 schemes are all very well but they magnify the spacing issues x2 as well. Along with the usual "f"ing question it comes unstuck where I've added half-width bricks at the start or end of a glyph.
Oh well. Trouble is my middle name.
288752
Published: 23rd April, 2009
Last edited: 11th May, 2009
Created: 21st April, 2009
It was exhausting getting this far. Figs and ligs to follow when I fall back in love with it.
13418728
Published: 18th April, 2009
Last edited: 22nd June, 2009
Created: 16th April, 2009
I was thinking you could cut down the bricks in the toolbox by a third by casting sub-menus off each of the rotating bricks; i.e. each rotating brick would have a little button a la Photoshop, giving access to the other three rotations. This retains a degree of user-friendliness for new initiates to the site. (No mucking about with special keys for rotations.)
If the user's palette floated like the others, that would give more room too. I find the floating palettes quite good because you can drag them out of the way.
1211293
Published: 12th February, 2009
Last edited: 20th April, 2009
Created: 12th February, 2009
Last night I couldn't sleep but I resisted the temptation to get up and hack out a few glyphs.
I really should go to bed now.