<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FontStructions from Qreed2008 (Sorted by Sharing Date)</title>
    <description>Fontstructions from FontStruct.com</description>
    <link>http://fontstruct.com</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“DOS/V 16px Full Ver (Japanese)” by Qreed2008]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=6a5e316e&id=2856624&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>CURRENTLY UNFINISHED.</p>

<p>* Edit (May 6): By the way, some days ago, I found out that the 16px and 19px fonts were different, however it seemed to only be in the Box Drawing things. I'm continuing this assuming all of the fullwidth are the same between 16px and 19px. I haven't seen one go outside of the 16x16 box that they all follow, and the DOS/V copy I had doesn't seem to have a 19px font ROM for fullwidth, so</p>

<p>NOTE: (almost) All non-Japanese half-width characters are from Px437&nbsp;DOS/V re. JPN16, from the Oldschool PC Fonts Pack by VileR https://int10h.org/oldschool-pc-fonts/ (hoping I did this right)</p>

<p>However, I have moved everything that does not appear in the non-DBCS font ROM into PUA, as it appears not to be official. Except backslash and ~.</p>

<p>Also, macron (the overline thing) (¯)&nbsp;is from the half-width font ROM, that's not in the Px437 ver. Same with&nbsp;↲ and ⌧.</p>

<p>Everything else is my own findings.</p>

<p>Speaking of, I found a premade VirtualBox VM with DOS/V J5.02, and managed to get an app called DBCSView onto it (which shows tables of all the DBCS codepoints), so to my knowledge, once everything I found there is into this font, this font is complete. Unless any newer DOS/V added more, and it is verifiably the same font, because it kinda varies.</p>

<p>Also to my knowledge, no DOS/V Korean releases are available, so those were pulled from photos of the releases in question running on computers. I'm adding them to this because I have seen some with the same Latin portions as JPN16.</p>

<p>* Edit: there *is* OS/2 2.1 Korean (or at least a beta of it), which seems to have the same Latin. However, the conversion of code page 949 from the site below also involves the CJK Ideographs (and the PUA, which scares me more than you can imagine), which means it will probably have to be its own font too</p>

<p>* Edit edit: It also has a char for 0x7F unlike DOS/V Japanese, and it's not the same one that Px437 had</p>

<p>* Edit edit 2: it has Japanese in it too for some reason, or at least some of the kana</p>

<p>* Edit edit 2 edit (May 6): The ひ is different</p>

<p>BetaWiki's screenshots for PC-DOS/V T7.0 (Taiwanese) also have the same Latin too, however I might avoid it because there would probably be a lot of overlap (assuming all the overlapping chars are different, which seems to be the case). Maybe I'll make a 2nd one, idk</p>

<p>* Edit: I could probably just find another place to put them all, but idk</p>

<p>The code points I used to add full-width characters can be found here:&nbsp;https://icu4c-demos.unicode.org/icu-bin/convexp?conv=ibm-942</p>

<p>Except:</p>

<p>* Full-width 25CB (○) was moved to 25EF (◯) because 25CB already had a half-width version in that slot (from the Px437 version), and 25EF on the screenshot I'm using was a duplicate</p>

<p>* I moved 25A0 (from Px437 version) to 25AA to put the full-width version in 25A0</p>

<p>* Full-width arrows are at 21A4 (↤) to 21A7 (↧) because the half-width ones are using the originals</p>]]></description>
      <link>https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2856624/dos-v-16px-full-ver-japanese</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 03:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Microsoft disk label (1990-1995)” by Qreed2008]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=69e226be&id=2866104&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Recreation of the dot matrix font used for some Windows disks from 1990-1995 (or at least to my knowledge). Not completed, but this has everything I found so far.</p>

<p></p>

<p>As of last edit, this has the set of characters from the photos of the Windows 3.0 RC12, Windows 3.1 builds 26, 60, and 61d, and Windows 95 build 314&nbsp;labels.</p>

<p>I am once again unsure of lowercase d, but it might be right, because n and d next to each other seem to have even spacing.</p>

<p>Also, in every case I've seen (at least where the photos are high-quality enough), I see an extra space between the 2 lines in the lowercase y. I did add it, but it goes off the left side of the character, because I am really insistent on the idea of it being 4-width instead of 5.</p>

<p></p>

<p>No wide ones this time.</p>]]></description>
      <link>https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2866104/microsoft-disk-label-1990-1995</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“Microsoft disk label (1983-1989)” by Qreed2008]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=69e226b3&id=2865502&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>Recreation of the dot matrix font used for some MS-DOS and Windows disks from 1983-1989 (or at least to my knowledge). Though, the only one with this form from Windows 1.0x is the BYTE demo, every build's label (out of the ones with photos available) seem&nbsp;to have a different font. Not completed, but this has everything I found so far.</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>As of last edit, this has the set of characters from the photos of the MS-DOS 3.00 Beta 3, Multitasking MS-DOS 4.00 Internal Work 2.06, Windows 1.01 BYTE demo (somewhat), Windows 2.02 Beta 3 and 4 (somewhat), Windows 3.0 build 14, Microsoft Excel Version N(?) Beta 2 (just for uppercase X), and PCjs's one MS-DOS 2.00 set (just for #)'s&nbsp;labels.</p>

<p>The height of the middle part of W and the position of comma are guesses somewhat, because it was hard to tell (they're from the Internal Work 2.06 labels, though the W is also on the Windows 1.01 BYTE demo label, and it seems to be right).</p>

<p>I'm also unsure about lowercase d (from Windows 1.01 BYTE demo and Windows 2.02 Beta 3 and 4 labels). It's hard to tell on all of them. *Edit: Windows 3.0 build 14 label is a really really high quality photo, but I'm still kinda guessing.</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>The wide ones were added under fullwidth Latin. They appear on MS-DOS 3.00 Beta 3 and Multitasking MS-DOS 4.00 Internal Work 2.06's labels. (And maybe more MS-DOS betas, but I have not seen it appear on any Windows 1.x-2.x disks yet.)</p>

<p>It's not hard to turn a regular into a wide one and vice versa, I'm just sticking to the ones that appeared on&nbsp;labels, at least for now.</p>]]></description>
      <link>https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/2865502/microsoft-disk-label-1983-1989</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
