<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FontStructions from jabberwock82 (Sorted by Sharing Date)</title>
    <description>Fontstructions from FontStruct.com</description>
    <link>http://fontstruct.com</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 04:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[“6x13 Apollo” by jabberwock82]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://render.fontstruct.com/renderer/render?v=61677e1c&id=1765545&w=1600&h=150&f=0&a=left&t=AaBbCc%2BHandgloves%2B123"/><br/><p>This is a reproduction of the 6x13 font on the old Apollo workstations.&nbsp; I've always liked this font - it's readable, but quite a bit narrower than other monospaced fonts that I've found.&nbsp; Trouble is, as monitors have gotten higher-resolution and my eyes have gotten lower-resolution, I'm having trouble reading the original bitmap font.</p>

<p>This font is almost identical to "6x13 redux", except (a) a few glyphs were slightly different, and (b) "6x13 redux" isn't monospaced.</p>

<p>Size 12 (under Windows 10 at least) is virtually identical to the original bitmap.&nbsp; Size 15 scales pretty well, but sizes in between 12 &amp; 15 don't look that great.</p>]]></description>
      <link>https://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/1765545/6x13-redux-2</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 01:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
