The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.
Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.
If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.
28 Comments
It reminds me of early 1960's comedy film titles. 10/10
Just hope to finish on time, still have many to be done...
Yes it's only 3 days left and this would be a busy work. I don't have very much free time even if now is students big holiday in my country, and yes I'm still a student ;)
it worth the effort :)
Already loving those and, the, or. And waiting for your terrific samples!
Stiff, Zelemin, Lupo and now the "Ugly" one, go straight to favorites!
You don't need a professional graphic application to make a good design.
All you need is just your creativity and take advantage of existing resources even if it's limited.
And you have a great creativity, the example is your Winthaus sample, I love that.
Look, a 10-year-old kid can make design that good :)
you can get them at fontshop.
Just imagine, when this font is going publicly, this font will be called by the people "the ugly script" whereas I made this with hours and hours choosing the right shape, good looks, and even I made ligatures to make it beautiful, and I named it "ugly"??
And, many people say this is not ugly at all, and I totally agree with them (thanks for the appreciations!) this make me believe that I should change the "ugly" to a better name.
I change it to "Farmhand Script" inspired from the Architaraz' first comment:
"Well, it's not ugly, at least at pixel size. I especially like how the word "farmhand" looks."
What do you think, should I change the name? Or any suggestions for the name?? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I thought the name could be changed too because it wasn't ugly at all.
About the competition, the winners really deserved it, winty :) Disappointed. I feel the same like you (a bit), it's normal I think. I'm a bit sure that some of us that entered the competition and didn't win feel the same.
Now, I learned something from the competition. You must understand the purpose of this competition. What is it? Making a beautiful scripts? Not only that I think. The staff wants to see if modularity works on complexity of script fonts.
Now look who's the winner, Stiff Script, Jalgas, simple but powerful... Lupo wins because of its originality that is really awesome.
@elmo: Thanks, compañero!
Please sign in to comment.