CakePHPen-usSun, 19 May 2013 19:54:31 +0000Sun, 19 May 2013 19:54:31 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssminimum: FontStructionshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructors/minimumFontStructions by minimumfs Mullionshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_mullionshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/814978<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/814978/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Tungsten (W)http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_tungsten_whttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/738921<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/738921/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs Lead (Pb).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Lead (Pb)http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_lead_pbhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/234395<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/234395/1" alt="" /><br />It's elemental.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Tin (Sn)http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_tin_snhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/234566<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/234566/1" alt="" /><br />It's basic.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Silver (Ag)http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_silver_aghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/234780<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/234780/1" alt="" /><br />It's precious.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Shadehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_shadehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/619703<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/619703/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Scroll (Not)http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_scroll_nothttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/572125<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/572125/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs Scroll.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Bas Relief http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_bas_reliefhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/210476<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/210476/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Random Junctionhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_random_junctionhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/700389<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/700389/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs Random.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Random Patternhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_random_patternhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/700143<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/700143/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs Random.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Randomhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_randomhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/690455<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/690455/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs BANG ON! AND ON! AND ON!http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_bang_on_and_on_and_onhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/689105<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/689105/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs BANG ON! AND ON!.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs BANG ON! AND ON!http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_bang_on_and_onhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/689080<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/689080/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs BANG ON!.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs BANG ON!http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_bang_onhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/687489<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/687489/1" alt="" /><br />Adding the hatch, and having the hatch line up, forced the glyphs to to be shaped in a certain way. Hence this new version of <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/679174">fs BANG!</a> Designed to be used in conjunction with <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/689080">fs BANG ON! AND ON!</a> and <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/689105">fs BANG ON! AND ON! AND ON!</a>. ...or not.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs BANG!http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_banghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/679174<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/679174/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Translucenthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_translucenthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/639291<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/639291/1" alt="" /><br />A very old fs.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs A Fault in Realityhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_a_fault_in_realityhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/189850/1" alt="" /><br />Waaaaaaaay too many dots. ^_^Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Scrollhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_scrollhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/570626<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/570626/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs Arc Test 2:2http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_arc_test_2_2http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/522497<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/522497/1" alt="" /><br />Clone of fs Arc Test 1:1, which was started on Fri, 27th August, 11:59 AM 2010.<br><br> As simple as this fs may appear to be, it was much more complex to pull off. The curves and angles just did not match. The original version was at filter 1:1. Today--after a long time--I had enough free time to play around. Cloned and upped the filter to 2:2 (well, 1.75:1.75 to be exact). The 0.25 offset was initially put into place for the creative process, just so I know which brick was where. The breaks became a design element somewhere along the way. That caused additional brick placement problems. A full 2:2 filter would have made things much easier. Regardless, I am reasonably satisfied with the outcome. Needless to say, each glyph went through a whole bunch of iterations before settling on what's currently visible. Not all turned out good. The 'V', for instance. Who knows, better solutions may exist.<br><br> Take a square, split it horizontally, vertically and diagonally. This gives just 16 line segments to work with. I have a book where the author lists every possible combination of those 16 line segments. That gives a staggering 65535 total possibilities. And that's just straight lines. I mention this because the uppercase grid here is 6×8=48 bricks (counting one 2:2 brick as 4 1:1 bricks). Then there is the possibility of using a whole slew of 4×4 brick shape. I am not even going to attempt to figure out how many total possible combinations that makes but I am sure it is a number much larger than 65535.<br><br> The point is, with so many possible brick combinations, better solutions most probably exist. I just may be too narrow-minded to visualize them.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000fs no escapehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_no_escapehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/467171<img src="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/get_preview/467171/1" alt="" /><br />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000