Advertisement

Details

Description:
-
Stats:
60 characters, 5 downloads
Created:
Fri, 14th August, 4:10 AM 2009
Last Edit:
Sun, 16th August, 11:51 AM 2009
Tags:
-
Rate it:
  • Currently 8.24868
8.2Balanced%20Rating%3A%20%3Cb%20class%3D%22weighted_value%22%3E8.2%3C%2Fb%3E%3Cbr%2F%3EAverage%20Rating%3A%20%3Cb%20class%3D%22rating_value%22%3E9.3%3C%2Fb%3E%3Cbr%2F%3EClick%20for%20more%20information%20about%20this%20rating. 6 votes
sign in to vote.
Shared:

Discussion

intaglio
intaglio Fri, 14th August, 2009

So many slippery currents to avoid. So many rocks to anticipate. It's dicing with death to mix two styles like this, there's no way I'll be able to sustain it through an upper case. But I have to try.

So many slippery currents to avoid. So many rocks to anticipate. It's dicing with death to mix two styles like this, there's no way I'll be able to sustain it through an upper case. But I have to try.

p2pnut
p2pnut Fri, 14th August, 2009

Is it a Sladge? Is it a Web? ... whatever it is it's worth a go at the UC :)


intaglio
intaglio Fri, 14th August, 2009

It's as I anticipated: the parents are turning out to be far more gruesome than the alleged offspring.


Frodo7
Frodo7 Sun, 16th August, 2009

Yet another masterpiece. I don't know why do I like your fonts so much. You seem to make a number of unexpected, odd moves I would never dare to make. And those are working surprisingly well. They also convey your hallmark. My respect, the highest.


intaglio
intaglio Sun, 16th August, 2009

Thanks, Frodo. I'm thinking that in the upper case the tops should have block serifs and the bottoms wedges, but maybe that's a bit too formal for a schizoid font like this. I quite like "spanners in the works" so maybe it should just be the occasional glyph which goes thud! It's quite fun working out which ones the clangers should be.


intaglio
intaglio Sun, 16th August, 2009