Download disabled

Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.

If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.

FS PATRON

Inspired by: http://ec2-75-101-174-59.compute-1.amazonaws.com/fontstructions/show/codename_bauhaus Original FS logo is much better imo, but this one would be well too. Based on this one: http://ec2-75-101-174-59.compute-1.amazonaws.com/fontstructions/show/codename_bauhaus Edit: I hope nobody had created something like this before my one!

Info:

Created on 2nd April 2010. Last edited on 12th April 2010.
License:

Creative Commons
Categories:
- Display
Sets:
- -
Tag:
Fave Tags:
- -

5 Comments

i think I already saw this concept somewhere, don't remember. But that's not really a problem you know, for example I have a large of 3x3 pixels fonts collection, because even in this very reduced minimal style, designers get different solutions and give a different personality and feeling to their fonts. Your special 3x3 was of course added to my collection

Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 12th april 2010

FS STAFF

Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “Codename: Monolithic” is now a Top Pick.

Comment by Rob Meek (meek) 10th december 2010

i like it +)

Comment by aeioutp 2nd october 2011

Excellent!

Comment by Agent Demonic Ladybug 29th january 2012

• Dead links now in your description : any update sb ?
• Too tricky to be legible : 'B' (like a 'b') ; 'D' (like a 'd') ; 'E' (like a large '*' or anything) ; 'F' (like a 'P') ; 'Q' (like a 'q') ; 'R' (like a 'r' - see below).
• Good attempts about the lower/upper cases (please keep up the good work to provide all the minuscules !) : 'a' =/= 'A' ; 'e' =/= 'E' ; 'g' =/= 'G' ; 'h' =/= 'H' ; 'k' =/= 'K' ; 'r' =/= 'R' ; 't' =/= 'T'.
• Duplicates : '2' === 'Z' ; '5' === 'S'.
Therefore I cannot imagine using this nice looking font sample as a complete one (in ASCII at least), sorry again.

Comment by dpla 8th march 2013