Thanks ! @architaraz : no, my fonts are much too complex and the glyphs much more linked by an "emotional" global esthetic than by a modular, regular system, to be "redone" just like that. And i also think that it is because as an artist i've never been a good "redoer", even for simple things, that i always develop works involving many different basic elements together. I had some hard issues in the past with damaged fontstructions, but as i often work in series in derivations, there's often also somewhere in my archives, some less achieved, or treated in a different way from the same basis to restart from, and generally going to something somehow different, that i take the challenge to be even better. After these issues i began to make more savings during the process and did 2 security clones for each important work.

I don't understand clearly your last sentence... Vice-versa from what ? What do you mean ?

Yes, i still don't understand those who use FS to make fonts they could do easier and better with vector softwares. Mine are difficult ones but actually they're perfectly adapted to the Fontstructor philosophy, even if i guess Meek had never thought to this kind of neither modular nor vector-like approach when developing it.

@Yautja and Architaraz : I surely did not think to your works, whose modular, and very smart approach is also perfectly adapted to the Fontstructor.

@ETH : Thanks ! Even if i'm still out of the TP club here, i try to give more "respectability" to the Alien genre in typography, while it has'nt almost any.