@Tristan Manco - This is very nice.  I'm glad it is back so I may make some suggestions:

• For the P, I'd make the curved part the same as the R.  It's too a little too square for the current P.

• For k, I'd do away with the serif on the left and instead have two vertical columns on the left (like the h).  It looks a little 'thin' when compared to the other letters.

• The j need the dot (or two dots) to match with the i.

• Most capitals are 6 dots wide, but M & W are 8.  I'd remove one set of dots from the center of each (2-1-'1'-1-2) to bring them more in line with the other capitals.  Then, perhaps remove the top center dot of the M and bottom center dot of the W.

Congratulations, and I look forward to futher developments of this font!

Yes, Goatmeal, I don't really get myself which were the rules and priorities here, but the outcome is interesting all the same to me because it points a few common difficulties in pixel font design. We get a particular mix of serif and sans (half and half), bold (left and right optionally) and light (accidentally), while the type color is almost fair (Tristan Manco should check with more text samples to spot the imbalances). Let's see how the numerics will look like (without duplicates, please). 8-)