CakePHPen-usWed, 22 May 2013 12:17:02 +0000Wed, 22 May 2013 12:17:02 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: db Klackshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: db KlacksComment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42118http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42118Another masterpiece. Very stylish. I love 'em all apart from Q. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from demonicshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42119http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42119Love it. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42120http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42120<br /><img src="/showings/show/6133" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42121http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42121@djnippa Yes that's true. I am also not happy with it.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Yautjahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42122http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42122Beautiful! I think Q is fine (unless you changed it), A may be a bit wide and maybe T could be improved.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from demonicshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42123http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42123The R is just stunning. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42124http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42124<br /><img src="/showings/show/6134" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from 3moDuDehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42127http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42127Love this! The S is simply stunning Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42128http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42128Wizard! :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42129http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42129@ thalamic : you too )Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42130http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42130The new Q is perfect. Great job.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fourhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42136http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42136A beauty.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42141http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42141Beautiful work. I like those deep recesses of S,V,W,X,Y,Z. Have you considered to apply them to M,N so as to make them more legible and consistent with the rest of the set. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42148http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42148<br /><img src="/showings/show/6138" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42149http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42149@Frodo7 I think you're right for M/N. Thanks!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from naveenchandruhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42150http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42150True Master Piece! Love the A. S,V,W,X,Y,Z,N work well. Not sure about M. It feels like N for me.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Yautjahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42152http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42152The new T is good, but M/N don't seem very recognizable now.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42154http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42154Wow! What a beauty. A definite 10/10. Would the (slight) confusion between M and N be solved by making the left vertical stroke of the M square at the bottom? ... just a thought.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42156http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42156<br /><img src="/showings/show/6139" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from ChristianDhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42161http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42161Do you think M would read a little better if it had a middle down spike? Just the suggestion of one, so it can't be seen as a K,X or N.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42162http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42162<br /><img src="/showings/show/6141" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42165http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42165@thalamic: Thanks, I thought about the same M,N design. The original M (on the first demo picture) has better proportions for this. <br /><img src="/showings/show/6142" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42176http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42176And here are you, the Masters of FS teaching so well: I'm learning like a child! You're greats! Don't stop this path, please!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42178http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42178I like this way.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42179http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42179I like this way.<br /><img src="/showings/show/6144" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42180http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42180hmmm?<br /><img src="/showings/show/6145" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42182http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42182Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “db Klacks” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42183http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42183@meek m! thank you for the tp @elmoyenique @Frodo7 @thalamic @p2pnut many thanks for this constructive support Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cablecomputerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42184http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42184Great font, love the M, W! Love those samples too... 10/10 And well deserved TP :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42197http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42197Cooooooooongrats! Love is the air...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42198http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42198I like a lot this Q! Nice work.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42199http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42199This is:Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42200http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42200Excuse me: I have some unexpected server problems. <br /><img src="/showings/show/6148" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42203http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42203@elmoyenique : no problem! ) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from architarazhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42204http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42204Elegant. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42212http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42212Another great work beate.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from truth14fulhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42378http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42378Congrats on being the highest rated TP! & awesome font!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Upixelhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42422http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42422BRAVO! wow this work is a masterpieceThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42560http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#42560@Upixel, truth14ful, aphoria, architaraz thank you !Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#43061http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#43061holy **** this is so unbelievably beautiful. speechless A+++Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from tinygreencostahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44471http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44471how do you do what you do :) New here and i am already a fan! awesome!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from ChristianDhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44896http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44896You've done a great job. Is it influenced by Cannonball? http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/wiescherdesign/cannonball/ <br /><img src="/showings/show/6678" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44954http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/668161#44954@ ChristianD I'm sorry, but I fontstruct db Klacks from db Drops. Similarities exist everywere. Similar is not equal. ps.: How is it with your font draftsThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000