CakePHPen-usTue, 18 Jun 2013 04:39:30 +0000Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:39:30 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: zinnamon eYe/FShttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: zinnamon eYe/FSComment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35082http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35082I love this kind of fonts so small, with only a few bricks in the heart. "The essence is always sent in a small jar", says the proverb. Hope you like this.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cablecomputerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35085http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35085Very nice, I like simplicity. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CMunkhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35087http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35087Really cool u/v distinction! Sort of unintuitive; incredible that it works. 10/10 just for that ;)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35088http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35088The essence sings like blowing across the bottle opening! This design could be “expertized” into a nice range of weights going all the way into fat face territory. I sense a certain intaglio feel about it. I dig the u/v distinction on a conceptual level. Brilliant, yet the v is too clever for its own good to the point of being illegible. You may want to revisit that one. I am not sure what is going on with some of the diacritics. But they can be tricky , indeed, with such stylish limitations.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35089http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35089Two different opinions on the v. V/v do read in many cases (therefore not <i>completely</i> illegible), but becomes an uncomfortable point of ambiguity to my eyes. Everything else is so natural, the headiness of the solutions breaks the work flow.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35090http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35090...though, maybe I am wrong! More opinions on the subject?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35092http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35092@cablecomputer and @CMunk and @will.i.ૐ: Thanks for your kindly comments, but I am with will.i.ૐ in some certains aspects about the legibility of the "V/v". I'll work on it a little more... but I can not resist to make they differents for one day at least!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35151http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35151Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “zinnamon eYe/FS” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35165http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35165@meek: Thank you very much for this new push to make my work a little bit more strong.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xenophiliushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35302http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35302Beautiful! Your work never ceases to amaze, and I say that with the utmost lack of sarcasm.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35313http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/534238#35313@xe: Thank you very much. Your words and comments are always welcomed. It's a pleasure to talk with people so kind like you at FS! Still working, we need you.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000