CakePHPen-usSat, 25 May 2013 05:12:43 +0000Sat, 25 May 2013 05:12:43 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: RMWL Uncialichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: RMWL UncialicComment from naveenchandruhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33585http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33585<b>THIS IS EXTRA-ORDINARY.</b> Looks like real brush strokes. I wonder if fontstruct can produce non-modular fonts.infinity/10 :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33587http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33587A beautiful start...looking forward to more.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33589http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33589What font is it based on?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33591http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33591A new masterpiece. Congratulations. Good to see you again on FS Live. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33593http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33593A new masterpiece. Congratulations. Good to see you again on FS Live. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33594http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33594Gorgeousness! I love your take on unical, Ray. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Goatmealhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33596http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33596No wonder you've been gone so long! This is absolutely beautiful. Glad to have you back, p2pnut.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33597http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33597So flyer... An experience!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33599http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33599I meant: So airy and graceful... A great experience! (Sorry for my disastrous English, dear master).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33605http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33605Thanks one and all :) @djnippa: There's a fair bit of Omnia in it; with a few hints of Gaelic ... the whole thing rounded off a bit and <i>slightly</i> less brushstroke like.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33608http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33608Amazing stuff. I'm looking forward to more characters.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33610http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33610I was so smacked by this I tried to write <b>incredible</b> as my user name when I logged in to comment. 11/10 Nuff said. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33612http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33612:) Cheers guys. I am not sure how to go forward with this. Uncial fonts are Uppercase ... should I attempt a pseudo Uncial lowercase? ... or perhaps a few alternates in a repeated Uppercase? The same goes for numerals ... I think I would be tempted to make them Old-style. Over to you, the FS community. All suggestions gratefully received.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33630http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33630Well, you really don't have to worry about lc. This alphabet is already complete. I would make a few alternative glyphs where appropriate using half uncials or Carolingian minuscules. For numbers try Insular or Beneventan script. You've already departed from the original Uncial script several times to make this wonderful Uncialic. PS: Sorry about the double comment. I only clicked to refresh the page a few hours later.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33637http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33637omgThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Upixelhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33638http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33638Great work p2pnut It's amazing how master the FS bricks Bravo!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Adien Gunartahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33643http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33643Are you human? I think you are Typographic Demigod LOLThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33754http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33754Numerals added - hope to do some alternate caps in the future.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33769http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33769Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “RM Uncialic” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33771http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33771Absolutely love the numerals. Superb! A very well-deserved top pick. The single character I would like to see alternated most is a more asymmetrical or swerving take on ‘S’. Still fantastic, through and through.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33777http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33777The numerals are fantastic and a perfect fit.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33778http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33778Thanks all - and thank you Mr M for the TP :) @will.i.ૐ: I'll give that S a bit of thought, although I can't see me doing much for a few days as I have a lousy summer cold and don't want to risk dripping on the keyboard.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33802http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33802@will.i.ૐ: I have attempted an alternate S - is that the sort of thing that you had in mind?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xenophiliushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33850http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33850I'm fainting. This is the best font ever made. The best font in history. I don't even have a reaction beyond shock. I can't rate this high enough. Infinity*3729453/10. Every letter is beautiful. BEAUTIFUL.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33851http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33851That's things like this so I call p2pnut "maestro".Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33852http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33852@p2pnut: please, look at your glyphs for the number 2 or number 3: they are some trash bricks between both, I think, dear master.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33867http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33867Thank you for the compliments :) @elmoyenique: I checked out the 2 & 3 ... there was a tiny brick (part of a composite) just to the left of the 3. Thank you for spotting it.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33868http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33868I still see a small brick lost in the bottom right of the number 2, maestro.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33869http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33869@elmoyenique: I <i>think</i> I have found the troublesome lost brick. You must have excellent eyesight - it took me a while to find it :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from LexKominekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33881http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#3388110!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fontcollectorhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33889http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33889Somehow I missed this magnificent font until now. Bravo, Ray! 10! 10! 10!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33892http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33892Ray, the revised S is quite lovely! The only minor constructive feedback I can offer in resoinse is that it might benefit from a very slightly rounder and bolder hip on the outer curve of the lower spine. Just a minuscule optical correction will help balance the weight of the bottom of the character in addition to enhancing the already clever asymmetry. I did not communicate well my original intention with the word <i>swerving</i>, and so your subtle and highly successful update surprised me. I intended to point toward the dramatic oxbow characteristics of many uncial esses, or perhaps something more high-waisted with a nouveau swash. Now, I really appreciate the simplicity, high legibility, and personal touch you add with this character. :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from ishallcallhimsquishyhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33896http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33896OH MY GOD, THAT MUST HAVE TAKEN FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33912http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33912@will.i.ૐ: miniscule optical correction added :) @ishallcallhimsquishy: Not too long really - now I am wrestling with a lower case ... might be ready next week.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33919http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33919With nods and winks towards Carolingian and Insular fonts ... here is an attempt at a lower case.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33947http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33947My first attempt at l/c used a slightly lighter weight than the U/C ... which I have finally decided just looked wrong. So here is the second version of the l/c, using the same weight as the U/C.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from crispycrakerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33948http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33948I am lovin that g lol. Just sayin.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33962http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#33962Wonderful. Just wonderful.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34030http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34030<b>!</b> :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34039http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34039One of the best fonts I have ever seen Absolutely beautifulThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34058http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34058For the record: this remarkable font has received the lowest rating (1) and consequently dropped from the top spot. I thought the troll issue were behind us. Now it is back. I am very sad to see there are some people among us who think they can be the arbiters. They want to decide who can be the best and who is to fall. They conduct their primitive petty manipulations under the cloak of anonymity. How pusillanimous. Not dare to risk even their fake usernames. If you have such radical opinion about the value of this font why don't you come forward and put your name behind it? Because, you are a nobody. If I were you, I would be gone.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34061http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34061@Frodo7: What if the person who dropped the 1-bomb simply hates all uncial scripts and, upon seeing Ray’s gorgeous work at the top of the highly visible weighted ratings top pick list, exercised their completely valid right to despise all such scripts? Hard as it may be to relate to this perspective and opinion, especially in this case of a most beautiful rendering, it seems to me one of many other possibilities than the font troll scenario. Love it or hate it, anonymous ratings from 1 to 10 are an inherent part of this site. Everyone with a user account can vote and by its very nature it is a more casual act than commenting. However useful comments may be, nowhere in the user terms does it say voters must justify their votes with a comment. I say people should have a right to vote according to their own taste, even if they only exercise their right to give low votes, and Rob Meek himself has <a href="http://fontstruct.com/news/2009/09/11/adjusting-the-rating-system/">officially defended this position</a>. Still, I <i>love</i> this fontstruction! I respect its level of polish (even as it continues to be polished), appreciate Ray’s journey of self-critique and how he’s making ongoing improvements – and have a blossoming appreciation for the inspirations that are the wellspring behind it. I also wish more people would give useful constructive criticism. I agree, then, on some levels. I empathize with your outrage. To me, this work clearly earns 10s all around – and many of us have agreed. So such a brazen act of potential vote manipulation for such a magnificent and richly detailed work (in progress) is outrageous enough for me to want to make many “Robin Hood” accounts to vote it – and others – back up into a well-deserved top spot! Better, yet, Rob can give this one featured fontstruction honors for being awesomely curvaceous! (And then really watch the low votes roll in. What’s the saying? The bigger you are, the higher you climb, the more people watch and throw stones from glass houses? Something like that...)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Abneurone Fluid Typeshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34063http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34063Just to add there are also "trolls" on Myfonts.com. I had my first ones ! But i assume and respect the rating of maybe some professional irritated by such weird and out of norm works that insistently break the vision of what "should" be a font ! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34064http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34064@will.i.ૐ: You are quite right about many things. Everybody has the right to vote anonymously and give the fontstruction a value from 1 to 10. And yes, theoretically, there are many explanations why would anyone give 1 to the currently top rated font. Is it possible that someone did this because of loathing uncials so much? Yes, it is possible, but not very probable. Maybe the person just happened to be at the wrong place. Perhaps, he/she should not visit web sites where uncial fonts are not uncommon. There are other possibilities, plenty, and I would give them equal attention, if this were the first and only such incident. However, when there are three or more similar events, a pattern could emerge. We have lots of data about votes, all neatly stored and available on FS. And a conspicuous pattern has been found. In fact, the troll behavior is well understood and documented on the same page (your hyperlink) by Gustavo Ferreira. Hell, there is a whole taxonomy of trolls. It is no secret, I am passionate about typography, the sublime beauty of letters and the freedom of creative expression. I don't question the trolls' right to vote as they want. I question their character. We are not talking about some random down-voting of poor quality fonts. We witness a repeated attempt to manipulate the TP list aiming squarely at the best works. I think, such behavior is destructive and detrimental to the creative community. It should not be encouraged.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34067http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34067@Frodo7: Again, we signed up for this rating system with all its rewards/pains when we chose to publish our work here. Comes with the territory, including the likelihood of being downvoted without ever knowing the explicit motivations behind said negative votes. I agree that such behavior can feel unwarranted, unsavory, and otherwise unfortunate, that it is far from a useful or noble way of offering feedback. But it persists, and has always been par for this course. Where to go? We can’t ask the down voters to leave, even as we can call the characters into question. Let us then enact our own highest standards of decorum and constructive input. Even our clever troll taxonomy fails to dissect the specific intentions behind a single vote. Rob stated that in-house analysis was done anonymously, and so no punishments nor corrections were made to the voting system other than eliminating <i>naughty positrolling</i> (in which case the trolls identity may have been indicated, but not disclosed). Nowhere has it been officially suggested that this trend of downvoting originates from a single source or a coordinated effort. Such a conspiracy was ruled out by the data, and seems to me an unlikely explanation of this ongoing trend. I suggest we remember Ray’s comment in response to the official study on trolling:<blockquote>A negative vote doesn’t worry me, I’m a mature person who indulges in this wonderful program simply for his own pleasure. However it concerns me that these mindless trolls could knock the confidence of younger, up-and-coming ‘structors. It must also be galling for those in the FS community who are professionals in the design world to have their hard work denigrated in this way.</blockquote>I wonder, @Ray, since posting that comment you have taken your personal work to a professional level with releases on MyFonts. Has this altered your feelings about receiving negative votes?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34068http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34068Oh dear! That old troll chestnut rears it's ugly head again. @Frodo7: Thank you for your concern my friend ... but ... @will.i.ૐ: I still stand by what I said before. I must admit that I hadn't even realised that this font had been at the top of the ratings - let alone that it had fallen. My main enjoyment still lies in the creation process, not in any scoring process. Having said that, I would add that I do get immense pleasure from the positive comments of my peers when a design meets their approval. Equally I am always open to constructive criticism and, in fact, have been grateful when people point out my mistakes. It would obviously be better all round if the '1 givers' were able to give their reasons - I can only imagine that they are less able to articulate their thoughts - and we should always be caring of those who are intellectually challenged, shouldn't we? With regards to my status as a 'professional', all I can say is thank goodness I am not reliant on <i>that</i> income for my subsistence. My main reason for dipping my toes into the commercial pond was curiosity. It is all well and good when thousands of people are ready to download a free font ... but where would my work stand if people had to part with money to get it? Well, so far, around 30 people have bought my designs (some being multiple purchases) and I guess that means that at least some of my work is saleable. However, as I live outside the USA, I have to wait until sales amount to $500 before I see any money and at this rate that will be sometime next year ... hopefully just in time to spend it on my soon to be great-grandson's first birthday :-) So folks, stay cool, keep smiling, enjoy the FS community for the good that it brings ... and don't let a few sad little people upset you.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xenophiliushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34663http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#34663Then again, requiring to give a reason for a "1" vote would just make people rate it a 2 instead. Those trolls go to extraordinary lengths to make sure that people are annoyed by them. This font is a hell of a lot better than some of the pro fonts out there. Bravo. I salute you.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35118http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35118Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “RM Uncialic” is now a current Featured FontStruction.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35124http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35124Thank you Mr M. It certainly 'features' in very good company. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35125http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35125...another utterly brilliant feature selection by Mr. Meek! :~)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35126http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35126@p2pnut: Congrats! I repeat once again: "This superb kind of fonts lets me call p2pnut "maestro" with total guaranty" (PS: -okay guys, although I know that he does not like to hear me say that about him, it's true, you're sure-).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Mario jr.http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35146http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35146This font is <strong>AMAZING!!!</strong> Can you tell me how to do those curves?!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35147http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35147Congrats on the Featured Download, Ray! Really superb. The font makes me wish I could see if you have hand-drawn calligraphy. The comments on this page make me wish there was a function to tag conversations on FontStruct. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35158http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35158Thank you will.i.ૐ, elmoyenique, Mario jr. and geneus1. The generous words of my peers are the greatest reward, although I must say that I enjoy being 'featured' along with those great designs by beate and geneus1. @Mario jr. When it comes to curves I stand on the shoulders of giants ... the work of djnippa and aphoria who produced the range of angles require to effect a smoother curve. I have made these available as an FS: 'Angles' http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/angles_22 Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fontcollectorhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35166http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#35166Ray, I want to add my congratulations for RM Uncialic's designation as a Featured FontStruction! Obviously, this award has been granted for all the right reasons. Cheers!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from asup759http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36217http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36217I love this font, I can't believe how much devotion you have put into it. I have to stick to 7x7 pixel fonts because I can't have this much patience. ∞/10 :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Wadimhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36386http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36386it's very nice! (excuse my English)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Tristana63http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36494http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36494You did a great work for this celtic font! Congratulations!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Agent Demonic Ladybughttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36710http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36710This is stunning. I think the g could do without the serifs though. @mario jr When I first started FS, I had no idea how to make curves like geneus1's Periculum or aphoria's Aurora Light. Then I slowly learned that curves like these really are composed out of a great number of angled bricks on quite a large grid. I am forever grateful to djnippa for making All Composites Saved in MY BRICKS, a font that uses all the possible angles. Also if you need extra help, I am about to release a font made out of "fake" curves that anyone can clone and discover how these curves work. I hope you find this info helpful. By the way this is the longest comment I have ever posted. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from LoveHorseshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36766http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#36766Well done. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Bismuthhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37589http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37589WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOWWOOOOOOOOOOW!!!!! 110/100! (I see that Demonic Ladybug has already told the secret of the perfect curve!)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37598http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37598@Bismuth: I guess that means you like it then :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Agent Demonic Ladybughttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37602http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#37602"The secret of the perfect curve" Ha! I'm not <i>that</i> good! ;)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38103http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38103Imitation is supposed to be a form of flattery - but I was not very pleased when I discovered that a clone of this design has appeared on several free font sites under the name 'Huggles'. This has been done by a so called web designer and <i>fine artist</i> by the name of Bruno Camargo. I had, mistakenly, left the licence so that this design could be cloned ... not a mistake I will make again!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38106http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38106I have the same problem with my font "zmorse xDad eYe/FS", I know your case. You must reclaim your authory to the webmasters where the stolen font was put. The copyrights are yours.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38108http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38108@elmoyenique: I have contacted the sites and Bruno Camago himself. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cablecomputerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38234http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38234The webmaster of DaFont.com still doesn't delete the font "Huggles" from the site. Actually, the font "AriaPenci Roman" by kix has stolen too in several months ago. And I still can see it until now...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38297http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38297Good notice: I can't find "Huggles" at dafont.com. It was finally deleted (I suppose).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38298http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38298And another good one: I can't find now "AriaPenci Roman" at the dafont site. This guys of dafont are working well, IMHO.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38349http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38349Unfortunately DaFont is still hosting 'Huggles' - as are Fonts2u and Font River. WebToolHub are the only ones to have removed this clone. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from EagleSoar97http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38580http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#38580Really cool! Check us out!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from hopps12http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39534http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39534This is so amazing. I have not seen many better fonts than this on this website. I think that you must have worked very hard on it and if you had then your hard work payed off because this font is certainly worth showing it off to evryone!!! :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39582http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39582I was just checking through my MyFonts sales and discovered that a copy of this font has been purchased by Pixar Animation Studios !!!!! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Yautjahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39586http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39586Wow, congrats! And since I haven't commented on this before, I'm adding to the long list of comments that this is a beautiful font. Love the g.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cablecomputerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39588http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39588Congraaats!!! I can't wait to see this font (hopefully) in their film...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fontcollectorhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39756http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39756Hearty congratulations on Pixar's purchase of this masterpiece, Ray! I hope they use it in prominent and conspicuous ways. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Goatmealhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39758http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39758@p2pnut - Yes, hopefully after using your wonderful font, maybe Pixar will FINALLY make a hit movie for once! :^) (I'm guessing it's for their new movie "Brave"?...)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39761http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39761Cheers all ... although my guess is they will probably end up using it on signs for the ladies and gents wc's ;-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fourhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39834http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#39834Congratulations on the Pixar Link!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from anonymoushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40022http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40022404 downloads? 80 comments (including this one)? You're lucky, man!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40043http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40043@micgio: It's a funny thing but, the harder I work the luckier I seem to get :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from RXF3496_FS10947http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40678http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40678I've seen a number of basic yet mind-blowing fonts over my time on FS. And I can honestly say that this is not one of them... IT'S SUPER AWESOME AND MIND-BLOWINGLY AMAZING!!!!!!!! Congrats...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from demonicshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40680http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40680@RXF3496_FS10947 I'd like to point out that your "time on FS" has been just under one week. You must have been doing quite a bit of Gallery-sifting :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40697http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40697Thank you :) However - this is due to get much better, thanks to some incredible work done by will.i.ૐ ... watch this space.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40995http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#40995The addition of will.i.ૐ's initials to the name of this font is in recognition of the amazing work he has done in refining my clumsy original. He has brought a sublime sense of balance to it, together with subtle curves that almost defy belief. I have attempted to bring the numerals into line with will.i.ૐ's characters ... but any lack of finesse in the numbers is entirely mine. Thank you William - you have turned this into a design that we can jointly be proud of.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41000http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41000An old spanish's refrain saids "Es de bien nacidos el ser agradecidos", something like "It's only right and proper to be grateful", will.i.ૐ knows this. This action honours you, Master. Thanks, you teaches all us in FS!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from beatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41003http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41003… Wow …Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from bikihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41145http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41145Beautiful. Could you please add a colon, though? Would make the font perfect. =)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41148http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41148There y'go biki :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from bikihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41158http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41158Amazing, thank you so much =)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from bikihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41179http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41179Actually if I may be so bold and request another addition... A tiny little percent (%) is surely no problem for such a pro like yourself? =)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Abneurone Fluid Typeshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41180http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41180@biki : There's a pro version named RM Celtic available @Myfonts.com with 172 glyphs including "%" published under P2Pnut real name Ray Meadows. It costs 19$. If you Ray's work, he has published @Myfonts.com expanded versions (up to more than 300 glyphs) of some of his best fontstructions. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41199http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41199@biki: I won't be adding any more to this font. As AFT says, a full version is available at a very reasonable cost. @Abneurone Fluid Types: Thanks for saying that ... I was a bit too embarrassed to say so myself. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from bikihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41211http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41211Did not know that and fully understand. Thank you!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Rabbits...http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41280http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41280Hey p2pnut, can use this font for a game I'm working on...it's called Panda!Eat! and I think this would be perfect...I have include a picture of what it looks like now...Thank you abd great font!<br /><img src="/showings/show/6002" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41301http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41301@Rabbits...: Feel free, although if you need the full set (punctuation etc.) have a look at 'RM Celtic' on MyFonts.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Rabbits...http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41393http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#41393thanks!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#42009http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#42009I came across <a href="http://www.whatfontis.com/Huggles-Regular.font">this</a> whilst searching for my fonts being illegally used on other sites.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#42017http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#42017@djnippa: Cheers mate - I have asked them to remove it. I guess the only way to stop this kind of thing is to make all my fonts Private - which kinda goes against the ethos of FS.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from valeriofrancescohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43449http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43449it's a pity it don't has a complete punctuation and diacritics glyphs, however, it's an excellent font.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from truth14fulhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43451http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43451The description of Huggles says it is based on RM Uncialic by Ray Meadows. Maybe it was one of those clones where they just change the spacing or something... Didn't you make this cloneable at one point?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43469http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43469@valeriofrancesco: The full font is available at MyFonts. @truth14ful: Yes, it was cloneable for just a few days. Now you can see why I don't allow my fonts to be cloned any more.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from valeriofrancescohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43742http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43742Omg I can't find it on MyFonts searching for RMWL Uncialic! What do I do?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Abneurone Fluid Typeshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43744http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43744@valeriofrancesco : Search at Ray Meadows, and the Myfont version is called "RM Celtic" Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Goatmealhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43746http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43746@valeriofrancesco - Here's a direct link: <a href="http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/ray-meadows/rm-celtic/">RM Celtic Regular</a> (And at 19 USD, it's quite the steal!)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from elmoyeniquehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43750http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43750Guys, you're greats!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43757http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43757Cheers guys for the 'heads up' to valeriofrancesco :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from valeriofrancescohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43978http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#43978thanks to you all!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Skopehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#44576http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#44576This is simply an excellent font! I can't wait to see the next glyphs!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#44602http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#44602@Skope: Glad you like it. This is a limited 'free sample' - the full set is available through MyFonts and Fonts.comThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jayiscoolhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45833http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45833I'd like to use the lowercase g for an Elvish (my own, not Tokien's) font I am making. Can this be made clonable?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jayiscoolhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45834http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45834I'd like to use the lowercase g for an Elvish (my own, not Tokien's) font I am making. Can this be made clonable?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45847http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45847@jayiscool: I'm sorry, but I don't allow my work to be cloned any more - I have had too many passed off as someone else's work in the past. I'm sure that you would not do so, but I won't take the risk of others doing this.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jayiscoolhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45853http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45853I totally understand. :) I've never had that happen to me personally, but I've heard about it. I LOVE this font by the way. I hope you don't mind that I used it on a fantasy map I did. If I post it anywhere I'll let you know and I'll be sure to give the due credit to you. Thx. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45886http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#45886Thanks for understanding. Glad you like the font and have found it useful. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from winty5http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#47375http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#47375This font is great! I have never seen a font like this on FS. EVER. Awesome! 11/10!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#47436http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#47436Thank you winty5. It was fun to do ... and has been selling well on MyFonts :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from architarazhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#49527http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#49527You said Pixar bought it. Do you think they might've used it on their new animation movie called "Brave"? I just noticed that it looked similar when watching that movie.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#49543http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#49543I haven't seen the film yet - but it hasn't been used for the trailers. They probably bought dozens of similar fonts to choose between, so they may not have used this one.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from valeriofrancescohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52424http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52424I used here. Thanks a lot man! http://www.behance.net/gallery/Skyrim-The-Gamebook/7661823Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from MUROTANIhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52535http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52535はえーすっごい・・・ 制限された環境の下でここまでのものを作れる技術に感激しました!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52540http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52540Thank you MUROTANI - once the basic skills are mastered it is just a matter of taking care and time to produce the desired effect. ありがとうございます - 基本的なスキルが習得されれば、それだけで、所望の効果を生成するためのケアと時間を割いての問題です。 I hope the Google translation is ok :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Reepicheephttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52852http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/506664#52852How did you make this look so smooth? reminds me of Lord of the Rings font. Good job!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000