CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 08:57:07 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:57:07 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Lamberg 5http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Lamberg 5Comment from CMunkhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15628http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15628So great in its simplicity. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15629http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15629Intriguing approach, but I think the <i>f, l,</i>and <i>t</i> are virtually indistinguishable. Try words like “lift” or “filter” to see what i mean.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15630http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15630Oh, and I meant to say, I like what is going on with “fi” as in “filter” – it looks like a ligature and may give you an idea for how to resolve the standard <i>f.</i>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Lamberghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15634http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/252074#15634True, there is some other parts of bad legibility. There is the solution of spacing it out somewhat more, giving it more legibility but losing some of the esthetic concept. Thanks for feedback.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000