CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 07:49:01 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:49:01 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: amebahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: amebaComment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12144http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12144This is very cool. Nice and messy and a great deal of ink splattered around. I know it was not intended to be very legible face, but I would bring the letters a bit closer. They seem to be a bit too far apart in text. Still, I give 10/10.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kekehhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12148http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12148Valuable feedback & 10/10, thank you. ~They seem to be a bit too far apart in text.~ Indeed, it is true. :-) (I'm a Japanese, I'm sorry in poor English.) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12149http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12149I have another idea. Keep the letters as they are, and change the SPACE: leave it empty, or use smaller blob(s). That would separate the words nicely. See how it works in text.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12150http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12150this is nice :) i agree with frodo about the spacing. i think if you bring the letters closer together, it will make it easier to ready. i think because this is an outline font, the white space that occurs now between the letters is fighting against the design in each glyph. if you get rid of that space, the words will still look blobby, but much more readable. try it out on a clone first :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12152http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12152that should be 'easier to read.' sheesh. sorry about my poor english, i'm american :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12155http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12155I love this :) A lot of work has gone into each individual glyph ... well worth a 10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12156http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12156I love this :) A lot of work has gone into each individual glyph ... well worth a 10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12157http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12157Whoops!! Sorry about double post ... wish it meant 2 x 10 as well :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kekehhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12158http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12158Thank you. I try it :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12159http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12159Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “ameba” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12161http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12161Congratulation for your first Top Pick. I knew it was something exeptional.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12163http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12163I saw your first FS work, rabbit too. I would like to invite you to our collaborative effort to have some fun. For details ask funk_king, who started the project.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12173http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12173Wow! Only Fontstructing for three days - created two fonts <i>and</i> got a Top Pick. That is really impressive. Congratulations :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12177http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12177Very good. 10. I'd use smaller dots or nothing as the SPACE.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cayohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12225http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12225So techy and grungy at the same time; computer matrix gone wrong with style.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12602http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/217973#12602Top Pick transferred to <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/euglena">Euglena</a>.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000