CakePHPen-usSun, 12 Feb 2012 14:56:32 +0000Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:56:32 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Aragorn http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Aragorn Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15441http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15441It's a work in progress. After 2 and a half months of incubation I decided to release this work to public scrutiny. This is an experimental project to combine blackletter and modern serif elements, and see if the result is aesthetically pleasing. Any comment, critique is welcome.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from fontcollectorhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15443http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15443Frodo7, your work is always impeccable. Even though this font is unfinished, it still gets my 10.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SimonRobertsonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15444http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15444looks great! ust one question, i thought slab serifs were close to the same weight as the stems, as the stems here have so much contrast, and the serifs take cues from the thin strokes, it seems more like a blackletter/modern (think didone) combo. just a thought, and of course i could be way off :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15445http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15445I may not say so for each of your creations, but there's some form of excellence in everything you share. Thank you for making us try harder. And, Aragorn, eh? If I remember my LotR, this looks more like Boromir to me. Then again, I only read the book once so I am probably missing some technical nuance. Enlighten us, please.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15472http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15472Thank you for your comments. No harsh critique so far, but I really need some feedback before I make decisions on some glyph variations. @SimonRobertson: Well, I'm not an expert type theorist. I only rely on some books written by experts. They describe at least seven different classes of serifs. And you are quite right about the slab serif, I was wrong. It is indeed a blackletter/modern serif, a.k.a. "abrubt contrast straight serif" combo. Thank you for the correction. @thalamic: Aragorn or Boromir? When you read the book, you imagine the scenes, the plot, the characters. To me Aragorn is tall, elegant and kingly, who was raised in Rivendell. He is learned in ancient law, valiant, merciful, wise and noble. Boromir, a captain of Gondor, is more of a soldier, strong and brave. In type terms Boromir would be a robust slab serif or a stencil font of military style, rather than a slender typeface like this one. Before selecting a particular name for this fontstruction it had a working title. I've spent some time considering various options before I chose the present name. I think the blackletter elements reflect his connection to the glorious past (he is the last member of an ancient royal dynasty), and the modern serif parts may refer to the future, he brings to mankind, the Age of Men. My only concern is that my design might not be good enough, worthy to his name. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15502http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15502This has the makings of a real FS classic. Elegant and useable ... one could almost imagine it being used for ........ <br /><img src="/showings/show/2330" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15542http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15542@p2pnut: You are the most kind. After a hard day's work I came home and found your pic. It made me smile. It made my day. Thank you.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15559http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15559Looking forward to the full set. :-) Do you know the work of <a href="http://www.stormtype.com/typefaces-fonts-shop/families-39-preissig">Vojtěch Preissig</a>?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15569http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#15569@gferreira: Yes, I know his works very well. The Czech Modernist set is featured in the first Indie Fonts book, p.215. I was fascinated by those letterforms, and experimented with some FS adaptation only to conclude the current set of bricks does not support those various angles. Yes, the m,n looks similar, but the present work is more of a continuation of my Nimrodel-Legolas line. At least the first primitive glyphs came from there.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16145http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16145Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “Aragorn ” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16171http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16171<br /><img src="/showings/show/2409" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16178http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16178This is coming along nicely. Faves: l/c a, cap Y, both g variants, ALL the ligs (they're so beautiful).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16184http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16184<i>this is not a type</i> ... it's enough to make ma grit ma teeth :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16185http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16185This is really good frodo7. Keep up the great work.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16230http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16230@p2pnut: I think you are the only one who understood my reference to René Magritte's famous work, La Trahison des images (Ceci n'est pas une pipe), 1929. (The betrayal/treachery of pictures, This is not a pipe). I just could not resist the opportunity of the obvious parallel: you are not seeing my type, but a picture/screenshot of it. Magritte teaches us that sometimes our perception fail, and there is a fundamental difference between the real thing and its pictorial representation. Sorry to bother you with lame philosophy. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16243http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16243awww... you had to go and spoil it. Neat anagram, 'nut.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Hamzahhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16637http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#16637Nice workThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from zen_killahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#17476http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/212938#17476really cool work here !!! work really well on your sample "type"! Can't wait the full set zenThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000