CakePHPen-usSun, 12 Feb 2012 14:58:40 +0000Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:58:40 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Venus Sanshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Venus SansComment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10571http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10571Using 2:1 (h:v) to achieve steeper angles.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1615" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10575http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10575Very clever. Actually, I've tried to make steep diagonals too, but your solution is much more elegant. It's worth 10p alone.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10602http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10602Amen to that. Unlike mine, barely any of your glyphs look like they've been tortured into submission.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10604http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10604Thanks guys. While there is certainly room for improvement, I was pleasantly surprised at how the curves turned out. I was worried that not having the shallower angles would be a problem, but I think the curves are ok.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10612http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10612Interesting technique with very good results. One idea for improvement: make connections between bowls and stems more consistent (now <em>a g</em> are different than <em>b d p q</em>).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10632http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10632Good idea...I changed a, g, p, and q to be more like b and d. I also changed the k, but it's still not so great. And, the numbers need work...the 4 looks so anemic.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1633" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10698http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10698<br /><img src="/showings/show/1647" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10708http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10708About the 4... good luck with that one. Probably the single most obstreperous glyph in the alphabet.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10712http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10712very nice execution and innovation. i like these fonts that "blend in." they don't call attention to themselves, but the effort behind them to make them look effortless - that's where skill and talent take over. well done. @tag - i don't know, them k's can be some ornery critters :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10717http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10717<b>@intaglio</b> lol...those 4's really get your goat, don't they? <b>@funk_king</b> Thanks for noticing. These type of fonts do take a lot of work that is not too obvious at first glance.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1651" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10725http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10725When's it getting apink dot, I wonder. It's getting better all the time.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10726http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10726Thanks intaglio. Your approval is worth as much as a pink dot.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10738http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10738Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “Venus Sans” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10739http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10739You guys are making too much great stuff, it's hard to keep up with the pink dots! :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10740http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10740BTW, <a href="http://www.fontshop.com/fontlist/families/venus_by_urw/">Venus is an existing grotesk typeface</a>.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10756http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10756Thanks for the Pink Dot! Damn, what a coincidence. I picked Venus because it started with V and could show off the steep angles. Maybe I will change it.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10765http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10765I'd like to second gferreira comments. The level of work here lately and the sheer volume of quality is staggering. Everyone is crushing it here this summer. I wish I had more time to write comment on everyones work. Keep it up. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10847http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207716#10847Word to that. There has been a big run of really good stuff the last couple months. I think the <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/fs_collaboration_1">FS Collaboration 1</a> spurred our creativity.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000