CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:08 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:08 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: untaghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: untagComment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10530http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10530... and that's without the horrors of an imminent upper case!<br /><img src="/showings/show/1613" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10552http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10552It does, it does. It does look more or less conventional. Can I take a tiny bit of the credit? Just kidding. Its all you, and very good you. Gorgeous ' as usual.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10576http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10576More than a bit of the credit! As you can see I'm slowly getting to grips with upper case forms. Can't wait till I get home so I can fix that M/N and g.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10600http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10600And to top it off the <b>N</b> is UNFIXABLE! But I knew that already, didn't I. Hope springs eternal...<br /><img src="/showings/show/1629" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10650http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10650This is really great, intaglio. Do you plan to add more numerals?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cayohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10667http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10667Most of the time I download fonts just for the g and yours is a must.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10671http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10671@SquarePeg: yes, but I'm having Fontstruct saving hassles at the moment. (Not this particular font, happily, but another one I'm working on.) The numerals won't be oldstyle, though. Too hard in this scheme. @cayo:I was happy with it when I first designed it but when you see it in a block of text it looks a little heavy. Serves me right for not using a slightly finer grid.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10678http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10678Saving hassles... ack. I get those too. I used to think my machine was too slow! :-) Good luck with both of those works-in-progress.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10730http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/207504#10730Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “untag” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000