CakePHPen-usSun, 12 Feb 2012 15:59:36 +0000Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:59:36 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: pustulatehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: pustulateComment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#9991http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#9991<br /><img src="/showings/show/1511" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10009http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10009Great start...I hope we get to see the caps.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10018http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10018Probably not. There's too much discrepancy between some of the harder glyphs -- s for instance -- and the rest of it. I might cannibalize the sharply inclined ascenders for something else, because it makes for nice combinations of fl, ff, fb etc without resorting to a ligature for the f.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10021http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#10021Bummer. I think the s is fine. My faves are the a, k, m, and n.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Frodo7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#13152http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#13152Very nice. I'm very font of your style. Some descenders could be a little more generous to improve legibility (p,q). The capitals look good, so far. 10/10.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#13158http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/202715#13158I want to see more ... please :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000