CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:51 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:51 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Transmission Boldhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Transmission BoldComment from Sketchbook Bhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#9983http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#9983A setting of Transmission and Transmission Bold in use.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1509" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#9995http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#9995Looking good! I find the tail of the Q a bit disturbing.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Sketchbook Bhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10011http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10011Thanks for the feedback. I struggled with the "Q" a little bit, trying to find the right balance on the tail. I think the "Q" looks better in context. (It certainly does look a little odd in the "All Letters" display above.) Here are some explorations on the design of the tail. 1 is the "Q" as it currently is. 2 is a little shorter tail. 3 is a very short tail. 4 is a simple vertical mark. I don't really like 4. I think both 1, 2 and 3 work in context. Any preference?<br /><img src="/showings/show/1513" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Sketchbook Bhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10012http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10012Or option #5. No tail.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1514" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10022http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10022I think 1 is ok, but 2 is the best.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10032http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10032How about this? <br /><img src="/showings/show/1517" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10042http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10042i very much like version 5Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10072http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10072Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “Transmission Bold” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Sketchbook Bhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10088http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10088I modified the Q to be somewhere between option 2 and gferreira's recommendation. Shortening both the length and height of the tail slightly. Works well. I'll post some samples later... (And thanks for the "Top Pick.")Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from zen_killahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10779http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/201773#10779a nice one love the sf aspectThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000