CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 07:58:11 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:58:11 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: FS Collaboration 1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: FS Collaboration 1Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9015http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9015Who's next? - djnippaThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9016http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9016question for the team - do you want to keep the license open so others can clone? i know some of you don't for your own fonts and you may have similar concerns with this one. unless anyone says otherwise, it will stay the same. if anyone wants to restrict, let's change it. - fkThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9017http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9017also, we can probably condense the credits list above. can we just keep adding additional letters to the first occurrence of each designer's name? i think it will be less confusing :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9022http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9022Sorry I restricted it. I'd prefer it restricted at the moment. But I think we should all vote on it. Majority wins. I Vote restrict it. No Cloning. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9023http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9023Funk King, if it's cool with you can you possibly completely delete the <b>24 hour fs community font</b> with the two glyphs you designed on it. It will only serve to confuse the final font, and it won't appear to be a joint effort otherwise.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9024http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9024hey dj - original deleted as requested. i didn't even notice you had restricted. no problem :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9025http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9025Normally I would want it restricted, but since this is a collaborative effort, in the spirit of the community, I vote for full unrestriction (!). PS: I am digging Funki's choice of letters. French Connection, UK would be so proud. PPS: I hate my own letters. They are bringing the coolness of the font down. All your work is so awesome. Nice pixelization on the N, DJSupreme; Cool wood, mesquite s, Genie-in-the-FontStruct; Disco U, starburst c, SuperFunk; Can't-help-but-retrace-it-with-my-eye W, JohnJet-and-the-Gold-Heart; Welcome-to-the-Twilight-Zone O, aphoria-of-Shangrila. Can I delete my A? PPPS: Cloning the font after each addition is losing the comment stream, which is kinda sucky.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9026http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9026also thought i'd mention - the name can be changed also. fs community font was just a starter name, but if someone wants to suggest another, better, more descriptive, evocative, or catchy name; please so do :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9028http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9028@ thal - don't hate :) this is fun as usual and your contribution is greatly appreciated. continue to experiment with your stuff. i know i am. i think one of the greatest challenges for me has been to get that sense of style or theme - that anchor that sets the tone for the font. since everyone is doing their own thing, it's been, uh...different. @ all - i think we have quite an interesting mix so far. with many glyphs still missing it's hard to tell how they work with each other. but i think we're in that part of the process where we can see how some of the letters do work together. maybe some adjustments can be made towards some type of cohesiveness - out of the disparity - so that somehow they jibe :) when working alone, we're usually our own worst and best critics. now, i think we have to use that same aesthetic that we apply to our own work - and perhaps be even more critical of how we can make our stuff work together without compromising artistic integrity. each of us brings that combination of designer/critic that should be applied here. - fkThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9029http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9029I'm for having access restricted to those contributing. I also think we should stick with working on the same fontstruction and renaming it instead of cloning a new one so that the message thread is retained. Nice work everyone - that includes your "A" too, thalamic!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9035http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9035I normally open all of mine for cloning, but in this case I could probably be convinced to keep it closed. I've often wondered about this, so I'll take this opportunity to ask what all of you think are the pros and cons of opening your fonts for cloning. I know some of you don't do it which makes me question whether I should be doing it or not. If you want to keep a history of this work, maybe we can work on the master version and make periodic clones for versioning? Plus, we wouldn't lose the comment stream. Oh, thalamic, just stop it. I can easily beat you in a contest of whose stuff is crappier. :) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9037http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9037Maybe call it <b>Collaboration</b>. It seems to me, that with every new clone made public, it sparks off interest within the group, otherwise you have to trawl through all the "obvious student" fontstructs to see if anyone's done some work. It's a catch 22. I prefer to put up a new font once new glyphs have been added. The comments we've made prior to this, are all good, but essentially not that important. However the comments and sample jpegs added when the font is completed should be preserved. Otherwise they'd be about 60 comments made. The font to me seems to have the cohesion of variety. A bit like a poison pen letter. The uppercase is very ornate and detailed, where as the lower case is simpler. @Fk - ha ha, you've changed that K at least 5 times, no wonder you're so prolific, you're constantly changing the angle of approach. @ Aphoria - I <b>restrict</b> my fonts, for the following reasons:- 1. If I think it is complete, and cannot be improved. 2. It has the full Euro set. 3. It has an element of extreme difficult, and time consuming advance processes. 4. The font is to be sold to a Font House. 5. Also when you create what you think is a masterpiece, then I wouldn't want anyone tweaking it, unless it's one of the what I consider to be the Top Ten fontstructors. 6. Why should someone else take credit and praise for what is essentially my Original idea. I allow <b>Cloning</b> if: 1. It's an educational font designed to be studied. 2. It's a very basic font, that is not that difficult to reproduce. 3. It's someone else's font, that I've cloned, and they let me clone their work. Each font is different, but I'd say 80% of my Public fonts are restricted, 20% are cloneable. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9038http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9038For the sake of simplicity, I vote that we all keep editing this same Fonstruction. I like the idea that this Fontstruction may never be completed. It's more of a living Fontstruction, that changes and morphs a little everyday. Don't like you'r 'A' Thalamic? Just change it. Change it everyday!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9039http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9039Up T'd; re-A'd. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9040http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9040i agree with dj - it nice to see the font bounce to the top and not stay buried with no one ever seeing it again, except us :( @ afro - i don't know if i agree that i like the idea that this font will never be finished. i accept it as a possibility, but i remain optimistic that uc, lc and . , ? ! will be done. we shall see :) regarding the message thread - it's nice, but i agree with dj. once the font is "done" no more clones. for now i think the message thread provides a journal about the creation of this font. once it's done, i think comments will be different in nature and should then be maintained. regarding restricting font - interesting take on it dj. maybe that's why i'm enjoying this - the ability to view some "master secrets" that i otherwise couldn't...he, he, he :) i often wonder if any of my stuff is not already being exploited by someone - paranoid, realistic, unavoidable? perhaps. i googled a font type over the weekend and low and behold discovered some of my stuff was listed on a font webpage - with links back to fs. a little thrilling/chilling, but i chose not to get worked up over it - at least not right now and just bookmarked the page. i think regardless of whether we restrict our work or not, someone who wants to steal and knows what they're doing could possibly do it, but might get caught - i believe our user id or name is embedded in the font file and can't be changed - whether restricted or not. perhaps it will help to deter thieves. i prefer to hope that if someone does steal something of mine and it's used commercially - that i find it and maybe $$$ or maybe not :( but i will say it is so cool to be able to look at how others work with these dang bricks - you guys have some skills :) i think we're like other artists. you can have great technique, but that doesn't make art - it's the x factor, but it's still so cool to see how each of you does your thing :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9041http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9041Not keen on the new A Thal, it's clever but it's way too wide for the rest of the font. It looks like you've gone big, just for the hell of it. I know it's all about freedom of expression, but we have to have parameters somewhere. I think it would look better if it was reduced somehow.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9042http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9042I agree.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9043http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9043I mean, I agree with the A being too wide thing.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9044http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9044I think you can turn off sharing, save it, turn sharing back on, and save it again to make it re-appear as new fontstruction. That way we could maintain the conversation but also keep the whole font popping up as a new font. <b>@djnippa</b> Thanks for your pros and cons. I guess I have always thought that nobody would ever pay for my fonts, so why not open them for cloning. Maybe I'm just too insecure and should reconsider. There have been several times that I wished I could clone fonts by many of these collaborators to see how they did something. Maybe a new feature to ask for? The ability to "send a clone" to someone? Then we could at least share amongst trusted friends. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9045http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9045Oh yeah...why hasn't intaglio contributed anything?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9047http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9047@ aphoria - i don't think that trick will work, but we could test it. i think i did this before with one of mine and once you turn it back on, it just reappears back in its original place :( and i agree about intaglio and some others :( but hey, the show must go on :) yes, request for clone would be a nice feature along with advanced filtering options on the private and public view pages :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9048http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9048@fnk_kng: I didn't mean to say we couldn't "finish" the font for lack of characters, rather, that the font could remain fluid not static.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9049http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9049@ afro - my bad, dude. i totally agree, but i guess that begs the question - do we allow changes ad infinitum? what if one of us goes rogue :) @ all - so even though we're not "finished" with this one, do we wait before our next project. participation here is strictly nsa, but i'm sure some of you have ideas about what we've done and what we could do next - if it's not premature :) my suggestions to consider: 1. new project - tighter grid. our first uses what i consider a moderately sized grid. how about restricting the grid to??? 2. new project - vary the filter. i pretty much work 2x2. i would be a challenge to work otherwise 3. new project - restricted grid and filter 4. new project - restricted character. explore what happens only using certain bricks 5 new project - themed - blackletter, italics, inline, fat, i know, i have too much free time :) these are only food for thought. i suppose we should finish this one first, not to lose focus :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9050http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9050@ afro - my bad, dude. i totally agree, but i guess that begs the question - do we allow changes ad infinitum? what if one of us goes rogue :) @ all - so even though we're not "finished" with this one, do we wait before our next project. participation here is strictly nsa, but i'm sure some of you have ideas about what we've done and what we could do next - if it's not premature :) my suggestions to consider: 1. new project - tighter grid. our first uses what i consider a moderately sized grid. how about restricting the grid to??? 2. new project - vary the filter. i pretty much work 2x2. i would be a challenge to work otherwise 3. new project - restricted grid and filter 4. new project - restricted character. explore what happens only using certain bricks 5 new project - themed - blackletter, italics, inline, fat, i know, i have too much free time :) these are only food for thought. i suppose we should finish this one first, not to lose focus :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9055http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9055me again :) re: restricting - many have voted. should we tally. i was thinking since this is a sensitive issue we could make a compromise. keep as is. when finished make a clone and delete those glyphs by restricted team members. sure it will won't be complete, but there will be the complete version. those that want to share can and those that don't won't. i think this keeps with the spirit of this thing. we really are doing this for ourselves as much as fs, right. i think creatively the team is sharing differently than what observers can experience anyway, but we both learn from the process. which kind of leads into the next item :) do we allow our glyphs to be used by other team members to possibly create other glyphs? i think it would offer perhaps an opportunity for some bit of uniformity in this eclectic set. but some may not want their glyphs used, so i thought i'd raise the question. also i think we should use some of the extended characters as workspace. many times i put alternates developed while creating a set at the end of the character set. this could be a way to show and develop ideas. just a thought. ...yep, way too much time :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9056http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9056@ thal - i cropped some bricks off the legs of your A. it's at <. this is a sweet character and think it works well with the bricks deleted. you decide :) fkThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9060http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9060@FK. You do have a lot of time, and ask way to many questions. You been drinking Red Bull or something? :-) Let's get this font completed first. Then after would be the best time to propose any new ideas. I also wouldn't want anyone messing with my glyphs, copying, tweaking, cloning except the members in the group. I could be wrong but that seems to be the majority decision as well. Nippa.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9062http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9062Re-revised A. Absolutely gorgeous z, dj.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9071http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9071@ Thal, thanks mate, I love it as well, so much so that I'm designing a full font based on it, and other sets based on my a,e,g,N & i. Who knows whether they'll work or not. For me that's the best thing I've got from doing this collaboration.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9078http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9078fyi - i did a clone to get a couple of my glyphs to experiment with building them out vs. starting all over again. i cloned a version as collab, then shared it. cloned another version as fk, then deleted my 1st clone as collab. results - once i deleted the clone, there is no link to it being a clone of collab - this could be good or bad, good if you only clone your stuff and only want yourself as the designer - bad if someone takes someone else's stuff and uses it without permission :( Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9088http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9088added hThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9089http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9089Who started the Y ?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9104http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9104I did. Then right in the middle of doing it, a massive power outage occurred that almost blanketed the city. This is the first chance I've had since then to finish it. Added Y. PS, @DJ: I see how you would want to flesh out the character you designed. I would too if I came up with such cool letters. Can't wait to see the whole thing.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9123http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9123@ thal - i like the Y. i really liked your previous A. i hope u weren't offended by my suggestion, but i guess by your decision to revise, and delete my suggestion would lead me to believe u might be. i thought your A had a nice feel and look that fit in nicely. although a comment was made that it was too wide, it actually was no wider than the W. i feel most sad that you deleted it and that it doesn't appear in any of the previous clones. it was beautiful. but i respect your decision :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9124http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9124@ thal - i like the Y. i really liked your previous A. i hope u weren't offended by my suggestion, but i guess by your decision to revise, and delete my suggestion would lead me to believe u might be. i thought your A had a nice feel and look that fit in nicely. although a comment was made that it was too wide, it actually was no wider than the W. i feel most sad that you deleted it and that it doesn't appear in any of the previous clones. it was beautiful. but i respect your decision :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9125http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9125Oh no, fk. :) I did think the A was kinda cool, but I also agreed that it did not fit. That's why I deleted it. I'm working on a font that uses that design so it didn't go to waste. No worries.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gferreira_adminhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9150http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9150Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “fs community font 1.4” is now a Top Pick.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from prototypehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9176http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9176I see a community! Feels good! I'm a "singularity", - but what you guys are doing looks great ... 190++ points by me. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9178http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9178Wicked Q Aphoria, you planning on doing a whole font like that?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9179http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9179@Thalamic. That Y still makes me chuckle. Martini with 3 olives. Excellent.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9186http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9186I did the lowercase q. Afrojet did the uppercase Q, which is much cooler than mine. But, I might do something with mine anyway. :) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9189http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9189@ proto - i don't know dude. i think u could make a nice contribution if u participated. u have created 2 outstanding fonts and definitely exhibit the talent to be part of our team :) i would say each of us are singularities and chose to take part in this for the fun of it and the potential that each of us felt it held. what i see happening is that collaborations like this can be the starting point for individual font sets that are further developed by team members who created the original or have permission to use. it's also cool how it's turning out - all these different ideas being bound together in the spirit of creativity and cooperation. way cool :) @ aphoria - that's a nice smooth q. yes, please do something with it. i think a full set would have lots of fluidity and presence. @ team - congratulations on getting our first top pick. thanks to the fs staff for making this possible. thanks to the team members for contributing. now we have added motivation to finish :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Magic Samhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9191http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9191How can I join the club? Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9194http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9194Sorry, wicked Upper Q Afrojet. When's the full font making an appearance?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9195http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9195@ magic_sam - i'm not sure how the team will handle your request since everyone participating pretty much "signed on" at the very beginning and may have reservations to allow additional participation at this point. me - i say let's vote (5 yes votes and you're in :) and i vote yes - there's still glyphs to do. @ all - re: font distribution - since vowels are like the "prime" letters that appear more often, it may be unfair for anyone to have more than 1. since this wasn't addressed initially, i think everyone should keep definitely keep what they've done. however, next time this may be something to think about. also, if anyone wants one of my vowels, i will gladly transfer the desired glyph to u :) i can make any of my existing vowel glyphs alternates and put them in an unused end character. @ all - we haven't discussed the use of extended or left-over characters. i was thinking about doing some type of "signature" - genenus1 does this regularly. also might want to do some alternates and place them there as well. re: name - fontribution :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9197http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9197I vote yes for magic_sam and prototype also. Although, maybe it shouldn't be a public vote in case some one wants to vote no, but not hurt feelings? I'm not too concerned about the number of contributors, more the ability of each. I think magic_sam has a very nice portfolio. Prototype only has two fonts, but they are both good and earned top picks.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9200http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9200I'm all for prototype and Magic_Sam coming on board. I was still expecting something from Intaglio and Minimum... @funk_king: Its funny how you mentioned my signature, because it kind of started out as an accident. When I first started, my name wasn't coming out in the readme file, so I wanted to put it in the font somehow. After that was fixed, it just became a habit. I've put in two more glyphs - B & C. They look simple enough, but as with the other glyphs I've done, you'd have to look close to fully appreciate them and they've been specifically created to showcase certain rendering techniques that can only be achieved in the 2x2 scale. B has outlined circles with shadows, C is drawn not with circles, but with tilted ovals. No brick stacking. Each glyph is rendered with individual italic slants. Enjoy. -geneus1Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9204http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9204<br /><img src="/showings/show/1378" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9205http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9205That 'B' is genius, Genius. So many great letters everyone. You've all done a terrific job. I say let in whoever else feels like they've got something to contribute.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1379" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from prototypehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9219http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9219Dear fontstructors! THANKS for inviting me. My head is cluttered at the moment, and i do not feel like beeing able to concentrate on the community font PROPERLY. What funk_king wrote about one of my things, i want to cite, in order to honour YOU ALL: ... like great singers - each one unique and magnificent in their own right ... (PS: When i'm ready for the community font, i WILL find an empty glyph ... say, Capital Yogh, for example; this glyph always cracks me up :) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9220http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9220I vote yes to MagicSam. Not seen much of Prototypes work so can't really comment. Has anyone contacted Minimum and Intaglio, they've both got the X factor. I think me and Funk_King have designed enough, we should step back and let the others fill the gaps. @FK Not keen on the oversized Signature. It puts the leading all out. Should this every be downloaded. I still think <b />FS Collaboration<b /> is a good name. @Afrojet, ha ha, it looks excellent dude. Lovin the slab serif - Works a treat, very usable, and works with the restrictions of Fontstruct, rather than fighting against them. So a nice clean result. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9229http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9229</i></em>OH! Yes, that's totally uncool.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9233http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9233That's really worrying, as someone could delete the whole font if they so desired!! Rule 1. <b>PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS!</b> Rule 2. <b>PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS!!</b> Rule 3. <b>PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS!!!</b> It may have been as genuine mistake. Whoever did it, please own up, and take it on the chin. We need to know that it <i>IS</i> someone within the group, and we don't have an infiltrator. @FK. It was still visible at 6.30am this morning, when I got back from my gig at Digital,Brighton, UK.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9234http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9234How come everything's in bold! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Magic Samhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9235http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9235I added a P, o and v. Hope you like them.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9236http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9236lol. hey dj, it started back at the end of one of your posts. it can't be edited cause you posted as you. i don't know if that's it or if hiding the comment might turn off the bold. i agree - although the issue is important, it doesn't warrant bold type. well at least its not bold caps :) @ magic - i do, i do. very nice and welcome. must put you in the credits.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9237http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9237@ thal - the corkscrew T, the martini glass Y - very nice, indeed :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9238http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9238</b> Somebody took a throwing star to the old 'X'. Thalamic. Why?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9239http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9239</b> hey guys. i just added an "H". Whoever changes glyphs from ohers: Guys, who destroy and infiltrate other people's thoughts and projects are poor. that is not only disrespecting, it's evil and wrong. Wimp! kix edit: bold mode stopped :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9240http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9240@ thal - the corkscrew T, the martini glass Y - very nice, indeed :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9242http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9242I love this font and its uniqueness every letter. I was wondering if I could make a few letters?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9243http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9243I love this font and its uniqueness every letter. I was wondering if I could make a few letters?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9248http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9248That's a great X thalamic! Let the record show that I did NOT alter any glyphs but my own.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9251http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9251I was thinking about this messing with someone else's work (because being obsessive is my standard mode of operation ;) and I think it may not have been anyone. What happens if two people are editing the fontstruction at the same time? Person A starts editing (and saving) this font, Person B comes along and also starts to edit. The FontStruction that Person B will get to edit will be the partially completed version of Person A's work (until the last save). Now both A and B are working on the FontStruction without knowing there is someone else working on it as well. Since Person B has the latest editable version, those edits get saved, while Person A's saves get lost. Later when both are done, the state of the FontStruction is that only part of Person A's work shows up while all of Person B's work is displayed. Upon seeing this, Person A thinks someone has fucked with his work when, in fact, no did. It's just a theory. What do you think, Rob? @RobMeek: Could the FontStruction be locked from editing if it is already in editing mode? I know it means another variable to track, but maybe worthwhile. @afrojet: The I *'d my own X. No sabotage there. The other X stood out like a sore thumb. To counter that I just started combining the two angled bricks without any concept in hopes of discovering something, and when the shape turned out to be ninja in nature, I just went with it. :) Your angled lines slab serif is anxiously awaited. @funk_king: The cork screw is from memory. I don't know if I got the proportions right.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9254http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9254@funk_king: I think Thalamic is right. I designed and posted my 'Q' twice and thought it was done. only to return later to see that it was gone. I think this happens when two or more people are working on the font at the same time. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9256http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9256sound like that is probably what happened and was probably bound to happen with everyone going at it :) so i guess, no harm, no foul - thank goodness :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9257http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9257@afrojet: My niece (age: 6.5) was sitting on my lap, passing judgment on each of the letter designs between "OK", "Good", "Bad", and "Excellent" (her scale). The only time she decided to hand out Excellent was at W. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9258http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9258According to Internet Anagram Server, words that can be made out of 'F I K L U c f k p u' are 'Fuck Flu Kip Kick Luff Up'; some out of 'a e g D N z i M' are 'Made Zing, Dazing 'Em, Dazing Me, Maze Ding, Gamin' Zed, Am Zinged'. ;) /me goes to find what 'luff' means.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9259http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9259That's great, Thal. I take that as a mighty big compliment. Tell her that I dedicate the 'W' to her. Also, as long as we can spell 'Danzig', I consider the font complete. Really, what other words are necessary once you have Danzig?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9272http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9272I added a "V". Hope you like it. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9273http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9273looking real good. who added the glyphs that completed the uc? check out the sample text - wow team! just a few more for the lc. then numbers and punctuation please :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9274http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9274looking real good. who added the glyphs that completed the uc? check out the sample text - wow team! just a few more for the lc. then numbers and punctuation please :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9276http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9276re: space tweaking - i started, then stopped to tweak some spacing issues i noticed in some glyphs. it seems most start flush against the left margin (starting point), but some don't - should they all start flush? also the right spacing varies too - most have 2 spaces after the glyph some don't. i know for some it's the desired effect, but i thought i should mention so each person can adjust their own spacing. i guess generally we don't want to extend into the previous or next glyph's space - unless that is the desired effect like with the i and some others. please check. view the sample text and adjust as needed :) fkThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9277http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9277@ jhejka - welcome and yes, like the V and groovy beads :) how about some lc? @ thal - nothing like getting a child's reaction especially with this one since it's suppose to be fun :) i notice some of those anagrams myself - purely accidental selection of glyphs :) also, would you do alternate versions of both your A with whiskers and your X with some "speed marks"? please. i think it would be interesting to see those additions :) fk @ team - apologies for flaming several posts back. i deleted that post because i felt pretty bad going off like that :( this has been a wonderful trip and passions run deep. thanks for the good vibes this project has produced :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9281http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9281@ - i must say your A has really grown on me :) it not only displays technical invention but comic brilliance as well - i can't help but smile each time that A pops up in the sample text :) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9282http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9282@FK - I hope you don't mind but I've re-corrected the kerning on the font, as each letter needs slightly different spacing. Some need 0,1 & 2 after spaces. Those with serif's need to be different, certain letters like I,t,f all different. It's a bit of a specialist job. - djnippaThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9283http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9283Does anyone else think k,o,p,q,v are too big? - djnippaThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9338http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9338I added a "w". If you don't like it, you could change it. ~jhejkaThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9346http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9346@nippa. yeah i do :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Magic Samhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9352http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9352@Nippa: I think the o fits in with the rest, but I reworked v (it´s a bit lower now). And I added a y :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Magic Samhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9353http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9353@jhejka: like your w!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9419http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9419Just b,j,l & r to complete the lower case. I think those who've only done a few letters should do them. -djnippaThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9531http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9531I miss a certain person in that list. Guess who. ;) So how does this work?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9535http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9535hey saber, sent u the sign-in info. no particular process. just log in and do your thing :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9536http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9536hey saber, sent u the sign-in info. no particular process. just log in and do your thing :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9537http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9537@funk_king: Re whiskers and trails...go ahead and add them. Let's, um, collaborate.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9545http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9545added j, l & xThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9551http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9551added j, l & xThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9578http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9578Added a "2". Supposed to be a playing card (I hope it looks like one). ~HejhogThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9611http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9611@Saberrider. Lovin the j & l @Hejhog. That 2 made me smile, great idea. It's now just a numbers game. Can we complete? Only time will tell. - djnippa Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9656http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9656Added a plus sign ~HejhogThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from JoeAllisonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9740http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9740Its missing a lowercase b? Get me in on it! - Good stuffThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9743http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#9743someone's gotta do an "r" as well :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from JoeAllisonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#10048http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#10048I have contributed a b !Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15114http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15114heads up contributors. i am thinking about releasing this font on 1001fonts website. it is a popular site for free dls. i put some stuff there and i'm happy with the results :) i plan on providing the same info that's in the description. this could potentially give this font some extra exposure and in turn each designer and Fontstruct. let me know if you object.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15120http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15120<a href="http://www.1001fonts.com/font_details.html?font_id">FS Collaboration page at 1001fonts</a>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15122http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15122i hate html. pls copy and paste: http://www.1001fonts.com/font_details.html?font_id=3531Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15128http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15128I think that's cool idea fk. Maybe it will bring some exposure to all the great stuff here.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15761http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#15761Are you going to update the numbers, like on 1001 fonts?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17985http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17985Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “FS Collaboration 1” is now a current Featured FontStruction.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17989http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17989Hey. Can I make the 8 other numbers? Please? I can try. If it's not good, you can remove them.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17990http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17990@CaptianOlimar - i'm sorry, but the numbers have been completed, i just never updated them to this version :(Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17991http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17991@CaptianOlimar - there's still many punctuation characters that need to be done; if you want to do them, let me know.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17995http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#17995I have just noticed that this has has over 2000 downloads on 1001 Fonts :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18010http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18010I assure you that those symbols are pretty hard to make. It was all I had! In only a number or two was saved, I could be lucky, unfortunately I'm not, so I can't compete. I assured you if you saved just a symbol, I can just try. But since not, I can't compete. And I wanna! :'( Why?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18011http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18011But still then, there could be a FS Collaboration 2...so add me in te group. I can slowly work on a few letters or numbers (I.E. a, e, r, g, j, 6, 3, 8, 9, A, H). So if I'm good enough, Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18012http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18012Pick me. :) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18013http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18013Here my proof. Sure I might spoil the character, but there are others I can make. My two = <br /><img src="/showings/show/2618" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18017http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18017@CaptianOlimar - you have such enthusiasm - it's great that you want to participate in another collaboration. i'm just not sure if right now is the best time to do one. the reason i say that is because of the recent post by afrojet about a new surprise feature that's about to be deployed and a contest that will be starting soon. i'm sure many potential collaborators will be trying out the new feature and participating in the contest. i think it's a good idea to do another collaboration, but i also think that maybe we should wait a bit before we start one. let's see what surprises the FS staff have for us and then let's try and do something as a community. just make sure you don't let me forget :) i think your samples are cool. very minimalist and techno. i also see you have cloned some fonts. that's a good way to learn how to use Fontstruct by seeing how others have used it. so keep using it and i hope that we can work together soon :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18023http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18023I'm participating OuOThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18024http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18024I have created a letter lowercase s a few minutes ago. Soon, I should have more.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18025http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18025The "soon" is over. I have an i, e, k, s, p, q, and a 5. I haven't made any uppercases yet; The reason might be I like the lowercases more.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18026http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18026It's not all I'm making, though.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18027http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18027Any letters that I have can only spell the word "PSP". The famous sony handhold console. If I make a y, the e, s, and k can make one, spelling the word "pesky". I also have a q and i. If I made a u and a t, I'd spell the word "Quit". Which makes me do those now.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18028http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18028you are not only enthusiastic, but funny as well :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18029http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18029I now have the letters/numbers a, c, e, i, k, p, q, s, t, u, y, 1, 2, 5, and 8. Looks like I'm very good to go! I've got most of the lowercases, and didn't really many ANY UPPERCASE at all. The one that might be the coolest is the lined t.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18030http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18030I now can make the words "pesky", "psp", "quit", "pay", "cap", and "says".Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18031http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18031where is your font? have you shared it yet?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18066http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18066When the next FS collaboration starts, I'm gonna be joining.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18068http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18068hey Captian, i cloned a copy of your testfont and then i copied and pasted your '1' into this set. since i did the original '1' i figured nobody would really mind. i had to increase the size X5 because it was smaller than the other glyphs in this set and you used a 1x1 filter setting and this one uses 2x2. i think i got it pretty close to your original. hope you like it :) fkThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18075http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18075FUNKKING?!?!? You can't really be serious! You did this? For me?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18125http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18125Hey funny guy :) nice to hear you like my "t"!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18130http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#18130Looks like the information does not show someone who made the r. It is still mad,e so maybe give me the sign-in info and I'll use a certain font and make it my style.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#20431http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#20431<br /><img src="/showings/show/3004" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from collabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#20432http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#20432not bad fellas :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from 3moDuDehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#25446http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#25446I just uncovered this gem and would love to be part of any future collaborations! :DThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CaptianOlimarhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#31297http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#31297"Rule 1. PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS! Rule 2. PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS!! Rule 3. PLEASE COMMENT ON, BUT DO NOT MESS WITH OTHER PEOPLES GLYTHS!!!" ... Basically they are all the same rule with a different number of '!'s.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#31307http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/193911#31307Yes, sometimes you have to say something over and over again, just so they get the message. Although you can tell someone a thousand times, and they still may never fully understand. I peaked at three, I figured that would be enough.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000