CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 15:37:59 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:37:59 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: fs A Fault in Realityhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: fs A Fault in RealityComment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8659http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8659<br /><img src="/showings/show/1309" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8660http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8660whoa! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from gauzhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8661http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8661greattt!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Magic Samhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8662http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8662Holy shit! That´s a really nice concept.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8663http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8663Wow. It almost makes me dizzy. Great stuff!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8675http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8675One of the nice things about any Fontstruction is that it's very transparent to the community of users the kind of work that went into making it. You can't hide behind PS filters, stock art, or other tricky shortcuts. It makes looking at a font like this so much richer. I can see quickly the knuckle-grinding work (and thought) that went into this one. Nice job.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8677http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8677Thank you for the nice words, everyone. I am grateful to all of you (and everyone else) for your (and their) own fontsuctions because they make me learn. Creativity is boundless here. It's awesome to see. :D @afrojet: This was a surprisingly simple font to do. There I was waiting for someone to get dressed and ready, looking at a wall in sharp perspective with circular decorative pieces hung on it...and my mind wandered. I had the font complete in my head before my waiting was over. The hard part was done. Next it was just a matter of getting 6x10 matrix of dots live, and a simple copy/paste the dot-block on each letter and deleting the dots not needed. Doing it did not take more than 45 minutes, nor should it have because it is basically just a 6x10 dot-matrix font. Thank you.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8697http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8697Mind blowing. Great for logos.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8717http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8717Whoa! is right! Spectacular, minimum.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8754http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8754Every now and then I come across a font that makes me jealous...this one of them :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nemoorangehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8795http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8795Brilliant!! Using the dot matrix is pretty darn clever, and opens the door for other more complex ideas.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8854http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8854great work. maybe you can do mirror-image version - where it goes from smaller to larger / left to right - for your lc?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8873http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8873Another creative and brick-bending achievement, minimum. Bravo!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8875http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8875It's interesting what gets attention and what doesn't. This was just a simple idea and an average execution. Furthermore, there are just so many bricks (dots) here, that it is virtually unusable. I guess it looks kinda cool. Maybe it should have been named 'An Exercise in Futility'. Heh. Thanks all for the appreciation. @funk_king: Consider it done.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Dec4080http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8959http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#8959It looks like ur on teh side and not in front nice work!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from machocrhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9009http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9009Really nice!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9032http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9032amazing work. ps: what's up with the "Q"Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from prototypehttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9366http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9366Dear Minimum. I really like your work & your conception. (+ name, + plus concept ... +++) This one - looks great. (to me) But turns me on - 0.00%. IMHO, you should (could, might, etc.) go back to the roots of your name. (Back to the SHAPE OF THINGS -, not back to a SPECIAL EFFECTS department.) Do you want me to laugh or cry? Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9388http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9388Haha. "No more special effects." Got it.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9433http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9433No more special effects?!? Yeah, I'll be sure to tell that to Steven Spielberg and Michael Bay for the next <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/transformicon">Transformers</a> movie. "Hey, you guys, could you, like, put less explosions and special effects in this? Thanks!" Manifest and share whatever creative expression inspires you, whether it makes people laugh or cry. Why not do both and show your range. =)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9506http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9506Hehe. Thanks, Geneus1. I was merely agreeing with him because the alternative was getting into an argument. Although, I'm not sure if I have a "range". Even I have no idea what's coming up next. Currently I am struggling with a lowercase 's'. It is winning...so far. ;)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9518http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#9518maybe trying the "handwritten" style for an "s"? looks easier, and maybe cooler :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nampnzhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#13486http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#13486it' s greatThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from ngo2graphicshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#14842http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#14842WOW!!! I think this is really effective and unique and so detailed. A really great fontstruction!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from ngo2graphicshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#15009http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#15009Can you take a look at mine pls, Pixelo, I created this on the same kinda concept not realising that you have done it before me, lol, but let me know what you think.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18260http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18260This is definitely the best font on FontStruct, but I having some problems with the zip file, every time I download it it turns out to be corrupted. I've tried winrar and everything.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from p2pnuthttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18264http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18264@General_Jackson: I have just downloaded and installed this font to check it - it seems to be working fine. I have sent you a Message, with a few tips on installing fonts. Hope that helps.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18267http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18267Thanks for the message, but that wasn't the problem. I have over 2000 fonts and counting :) but the zip archive was corrupted each time I downloaded it. For some reason, when I ran this window in Compatibility Mode, and then downloaded it, it worked fine. odd... PS p2pnut- loved some of those art deco fonts, they're awesome. I might post a sample...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18318http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18318<br /><img src="/showings/show/2646" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18319http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18319Whoops! Sorry, I posted the wrong sample.......Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18320http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18320<br /><img src="/showings/show/2647" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from General_Jacksonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18321http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#18321There- That's the correct one.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from +NightWalkerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#23904http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#23904Wow. Awesome.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from pain219http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24136http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24136kudosThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from lucasjizhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24221http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24221hey man, this is amazing! thanks for sharing. May i use this? on designs? i just want to ask for your permission. THanksThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24223http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24223Of course, lucasjiz. What good is a font that's not used. Post a picture of the design when you are done, please.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Vladislav Sergeevichhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24587http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24587O_O class!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from mateuslmhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24847http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24847there's no archive ".ttf" into the rar file, can u help me?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from DRWHOFAN1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24912http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24912It Doesn't Even Come With The Font - You Can't Have It !?!?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24917http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24917I just did a test download. The TrueType file is indeed part of the .rar file. The font has too many dots though. It takes the OS forever to render it, though. User discretion is advised.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24919http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24919hey thal, have you tried to update the file and retry it? the last edit date on the file is last year. i recall Rob staying that the FS mortar had been improved and works better but you have to update the file. i would try it. this is such a great font not to be able to use; it would be a travesty.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24920http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#24920hey thal, have you tried to update the file and retry it? the last edit date on the file is last year. i recall Rob staying that the FS mortar had been improved and works better but you have to update the file. i would try it. this is such a great font not to be able to use; it would be a travesty.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from arr.gowtham23http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#25598http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#25598Hey sorry .. I am a learner here ... How to use this font in word 2003 ?? Its not working in it !!!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from BenjamiinxxDhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#26913http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#26913looks mad but i agree with the other guy way too many dots Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from arseniivhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#28108http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#28108You've created absolutely exceptional font!! Wow!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nogabhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#30481http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#30481Like!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Hauserhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#31809http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#31809Wow congrats it's an awesome and perfect design :D wowow i love it 1!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Mhnsh.t46http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#34898http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#34898It is more than superb ! It is spectacular. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from mister.zedhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35766http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35766Great font! What's involved in doing the exact font but reversed perspective so one can make words where the letters all diminish towards the centre of the word? You could even map the opposite letters to the lower case letters. Really top notch work. Thanks.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35782http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35782With the flip macro, added to the fontstructor by meek well after this conceptual and technical masterpiece was created, reversing the perspective would be a fairly speedy endeavor.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35916http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35916<br /><img src="/showings/show/5283" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35917http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35917The new work is truly stunning...and yet the fontmortar just can’t seem to crunch it! It seems to chew on it well enough – but then spits out a corrupted file. X/Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35918http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35918@mister.zed: This was planned for a long time. Your comment forced me to go about it. Thanks. @william: Flip worked for only the symmetrical glyphs. The rest had to be rebuilt. Still, done.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35919http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35919Yes, too many disconnected dots. The sample is a PrintScrn of the preview sample.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from will.i.ૐhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35921http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/189850#35921S & Z could have been rotated – I forgot to mention this type of symmetry earlier. But flipping the full square grid and then selectively deleting was what I meant by ‘fairly speedy’ (or, better still, building them from similar flipped glyph parts). A LOT less total dragging and dropping, for sure! :) Screen capture is clearly the way to go (sad, because I want smooth hi-res builds of the glyphs to work with in a unified single-point perspective – done theoretically via individually glyph scaling ). But, then, I thought upgrades to the FontMortar had obviated such scenarios? I am surprised that it will generate a font file that is corrupted and supply it to fsers. Meek?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000