CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 15:44:35 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:44:35 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Pandabearhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: PandabearComment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8723http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8723Well the k would work better if you shifted the crossbar down so it aligns with the gap between the terminals of the c. I'm not sure the "thickened" join between the two legs really works... the only other glyph to feature it is the x, so there's not enough of it to be a design feature, and it tends to look like a mistake rather than an intention. Your u/c X works, an intriguing idea. I like the treatment of the l/c f... I wonder if you should play with some of the other terminals like that? VvWw are difficult constructions in Fontstruct. You wouldn't be the first to be unhappy with them!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from panickburnshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8737http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8737Thanks intaglio! I followed your suggestion and shifted the crossbar of the k down. Furthermore I changed some bricks of the k and x, so that it fits (hopefully) better with the other characters. I made the sample again with the new version.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1324" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8753http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8753I love this! Maybe a wider version as well?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from panickburnshttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8765http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/172495#8765I'm glad you like it, emepar7! Maybe I will do a wider version, when I find the time to do that.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000