CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 15:44:15 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:44:15 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Styl=0http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Styl=0Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7609http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7609...<br /><img src="/showings/show/1165" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7610http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7610Very nice.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7618http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7618Isn't it fun :) This is beautiful. My only suggestion is an alternate s and I don't know about that w.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7632http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7632@emepar7: lowercase "w" or uppercase "W"? I'll think about the alternate "s" but I'm more concerned about UC "K", "X" and "Y"Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7633http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7633Changed the UC "K", LC "s" and "w" a bit.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7673http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7673Yeah the lc w. Nice, that's exactly what I had in mind.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cayohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7694http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7694<br /><img src="/showings/show/1177" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7706http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7706THX alot "emepar7" and "cayo", by the way cayo I added something you might need...<br /><img src="/showings/show/1179" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7713http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7713I just noticed how lovely the @ is but I'm not feeling the &...maybe more of an "Et"?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cayohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7717http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7717<br /><img src="/showings/show/1181" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7718http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7718Added alternate Ampersand "&" in the Tilde letter "~"Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7777http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7777Alternate "@" in the grave accent "`".Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xoxohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7875http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7875I don't know how I can use these fonts, can someone explain? I really like this font! - my english isn't good, so I don't know how to spell correctly-Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xoxohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7877http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7877I found the answer myself =)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7892http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#7892I’m glad you found the answer. If you need any help don’t hesitate in asking. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from zokishttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#9945http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/169581#9945LOCKOThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000