CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 15:47:26 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:47:26 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Paperclippedhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: PaperclippedComment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7045http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7045<br /><img src="/showings/show/1054" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7049http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7049Cᴒᴒliᴒ.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7056http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7056Nice, I like it. <b>@thalamic</b> Coolio trick with the letters.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7064http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7064This is wonderfully cleaver stuff Emepar. I love it ultra thin, like in the pixel preview. I really like the letters 'e', 'c', 'z' and 's' where the disconnected part forms the bottom of the glyph and then connects with the next letter.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7072http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7072Thanks guys! @afrojet I was just messing around in PS and to my surprise their bold algorithm doesn't look half as bad as it normally does :) Haha...glad you like the "s" as that's the only one bugging me. The lines are parallel but they don't look it to me...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7247http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7247Really cool variation. I see what you mean about the S, it doesn't look parallel, the Z works better, maybe try a small bottom kick on the S like the Z.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7249http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/159303#7249Great idea...I shortened it a bit (and the 2) and think it's more believable now. I wonder if this is the only clone of a clone of a clone! :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000