CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 07:23:31 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:23:31 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: ReMixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: ReMixComment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6394http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6394<br /><img src="/showings/show/917" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6395http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6395I copied M I X from the MIX09 conference logo. The rest of the characters are my extrapolations.<br /><img src="/showings/show/918" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Joostmarcellishttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6437http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6437Let me return the favour, this is simple but elegant, and works verry wellThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6458http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6458i really like this one. Except for "M" and "W". I don't think its necessary to break the 3x3 rule to this. Did you think about doing some alternatives to them? They would fit so much better to the face of this font, if they we're in 3x3 bricks as well.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6460http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6460btw... that "Q" is gorgeousThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6478http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6478<b>@Joostmarcellis</b>Thanks! <b>@kix</b> I just copied the M from the original inspiration, but I agree with you. I changed the G, I, K, M, N, W, and X. I saved the original I, K, N, X, and Y as alternates in the lowercase.<br /><img src="/showings/show/932" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Joostmarcellishttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6482http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6482great job on the M and W, the X is better to, but maybe it is getting to suffisticated?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6485http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6485Thanks. I wondered about the X too (and the K), but I thought the old one looked a little too skinny compared to the rest of the characters. So, I changed them, but I left the originals as alternates. I just realized, I should probably do the same treatment to the Y.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6491http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6491I did the Y too.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from alexfultonhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6494http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6494Hi Aphoria, this is very nice! There are a lot of similarities with my <a href="http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/78337">Nano Spaceman</a> :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6495http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6495<b>@alexfulton</b> Wow, there are many similarities. I guess there are only so many ways to make certain letters in a 3x3 grid. :) I like your 7 better than mine.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#6499http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/150369#64993x3 is the deal! http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/78337Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000