CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 22:21:02 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:21:02 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Wagemakerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: WagemakerComment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#6733http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#6733This is really nice and clean. Great job!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#6753http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#6753this is very nice. crouwel is one of my favorite designers. you did a great job interpreting the letters. the font is surprising readable and beautiful as well :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from tallmanbabyhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#7071http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#7071I find the 's' very difficult to read, otherwise I love thisThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from igorrossihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12229http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12229Great font! But I agree with tallmanbaby, the S is difficult to read. And the U and the V are just the same. So I tried to design some alternative glyphs. Nice job anyway !<br /><img src="/showings/show/1853" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from igorrossihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12230http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12230Sorry : the glyphs are A-N-S-V-W.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1854" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from igorrossihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12231http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12231And the 8.<br /><img src="/showings/show/1855" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from eaqhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12233http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12233THANKS IGOROSSI! As for the 'a' and the 'w', I have restricted myself to Crouwel's original characters. I think the 'n' and 'v' are really great, however, altering those would again cause me to deflect from the original poster due to continuity throughout the typeface. I'm only really allowing artistic license on the characters featured or at least hinted at in the original Crouwel design. I'll really consider the '8' though. EAQThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from igorrossihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12242http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12242You're welcome. These were just suggestions, thanks for considering them. I understand you want to stick to the original design, because I have tried several times, just as you did, to extend an existing font. Maybe you could still be interested in trying to switch the C and the E, if they don't appear on the original poster (by the way, it would be nice to see it here).Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from igorrossihttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12243http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12243Okay, I've just seen you posted a link to the poster in the description. According to your principle, you won't switch the C and the E. But it would make the letters more recognizable.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12265http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12265hi, it looks like you've changed the position of the j to accommodation potential leading problems. i did a quick number check of letter combos in words: gj = 16, jj = 4, yj = 16 or ij = 79, aj = 218, oj = 121... i think you should reconsider your spacing in light of actually creating more problems than really solving for this great font :) p.s. i used wordnavigator.com website which jmarquez posted on the summer games fontpage.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12266http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/147620#12266forget me. i'm stupid :)~ looks fine.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000