CakePHPen-usSat, 11 Feb 2012 12:04:14 +0000Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:04:14 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Old Monkhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Old MonkComment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8143http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8143Great stuff. I really love the lowercase...m, n, u, and x are great.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8168http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8168<br /><img src="/showings/show/1244" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aphoriahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8172http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8172The word "minimum" in your sample makes me weak in the knees.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8173http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8173maybe the cleanest blackletter so far... coolioThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8175http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8175Me too. ;)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8178http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#817810/10 from me.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from minimumhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8180http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8180While I totally agree with the 10/10 comment (Great work, Axel :), I did not post the comment directly above. It's some glitch, in the FontStruct back end (a true Ghost in the Machine). I only say this now because the comment directly above is nice, but someday some nasty comment may be mis-labeled as coming from me. Let me state this for posterity that no matter what happens, I, minimum, will <i>never</i> say anything bad about anyone's creative output and hard work.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8194http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8194Really slick stuff. 10/10Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8217http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8217I agree with kix...this is as clean as it gets!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from cayohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8246http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8246impressive!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8256http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8256Thanks to all! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from dadahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8266http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8266cool!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from eskemahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8281http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8281Wow. really good. some characters still need some fine tuning but the overall is impressive. Nice workThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8286http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8286Mmm, mmm good. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8295http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8295Cleeeean. A very friendly blackletter.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from CMunkhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8308http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8308I like it very much. Especially the diacritics.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8338http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8338an instant classic :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8411http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8411Since there's no other place to ask it, I'll ask it here in the comments of the top rated font: Who created the fontstruct logo? What's the story behind it?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nuovohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8493http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8493I like this font a lot at the very moment I laid my eyes on it. It looks classy and poetic. Perfect old-fashioned style.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from djnippahttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8646http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8646On using this font the kerning/spacing really needs addressing. It isn't constant between letters. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8664http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#8664@ djnippa: "Yes... You're right, it needs a better kerning/spacing...but there's not much possibilities in this range with the fontstruct tools... Problems come when putting toghether two round letters combination like: oc,bd,pq... Neither solution I've tried was ok, so I've choose the one that affect less glyphs combinations. Any recomendations & ideas about this issue are welcome! Meanwhile, the people who want to use this font are going to need making some adjustments on it. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from sdarishttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#17757http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#17757Jesus, Mary!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nadaeyuphttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#19267http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#19267Gooood~!!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from grandmajeanbhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#23509http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#23509Hello, Axel. I just found this site and it's terrific! I really like this font. Regarding the kerning problems. I used to do calligraphy by hand. One of the things that hand done calligraphy has that computer fonts don't, is that there is always some tiny variation no matter how well done it is. Even on the very old typesets, there was variation. I guess what I am trying to say is that while exact spacing is necessary for many works, sometimes you need fonts that have that little variation, so that it looks more handmade which lends its own special charm to a work. Anyway, it's beautiful. Thank you for sharing this.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xenophiliushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#29372http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#29372<b>THE CLEANEST EFFING BLACK LETTER IN THE UNIVERSE.</b> This font is REALLY good. <b>REALLY</b> good. I don't believe it! 48579104658613490561394569315/10! @thal: Well, who created the website? I'd wager Rob Meek created it.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Drgrithttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#29374http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#29374I think its scary when you can see [strike]1[/strike] 0 MISTAKES! UBER DUBER FONT!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from xenophiliushttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#35870http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/107668#35870Goodness gracious. I really freaked out. Feel free to hide my madness if you want.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000