CakePHPen-usSun, 12 Feb 2012 16:10:08 +0000Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:10:08 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: fs Minimalhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: fs MinimalComment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3674http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3674<br /><img src="/showings/show/370" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from guentersenhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3675http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3675Hi Thalamnic! A perfect 10 :D A REAL monospace! The F is great! The K is lovely! The X is extraordinary! The Q is brillant! Each Glyph is a "augenweide" (can't explain it in english ... and it means: goood!) Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3676http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3676Words fail me. The numerals are delicious.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3677http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3677this is nice. very astronomical :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3678http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3678I agree. This is perfectly pleasing. The V and X are inspired. The whole thing is inspired. Can I sublet your muse for a week or so?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3683http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3683Wow, that's quite the reception. Thank you all. Your appreciation is highly regarded. :) @guentersen: augenweide=eye candy. Sweet! @intaglio: I did this a couple of weeks ago. It took me this long to get the nerve to share it. Ah! the muse, so fleeting her visits.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3688http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3688A <i>decorative</i> minimal font: very inspiring!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3689http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3689Gorgeus! Brilliant! Awesome!....10 points! Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3690http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3690Never did the pink dot more deservedly fall from heaven.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3695http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3695Thalamic, an "all black" version without the pinholes would be interesting too...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3697http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3697guentersen, afrojet, funk_king, intaglio, Em42, and Axel Leyer...thank you all. Your positive responses have made my day. You are all very kind. It's nice to have friends. :) @inti: How nice you are. Many thanks. @Axel: This font started out as all black. The pin holes were an accident of brick placement which I liked so much I went and poked holes in all the other glyphs as well. I'm happy to let this font be sans siblings. @Stewf: Thanks for, as intaglio calls it, the pink dot. Appreciate it. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3730http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3730I agree that this is an awesome typeface. not only is it well crafted but there's a really well thought of concept behind it. there's just one thing that bothers me. I don't like the V solution. I know it's an extraordinary letter and the similarity to the U requires special treatment but I would prefer straight diagonal lines. the letter falls out of the concept anyway so you could as well use straigt diagonal lines there, though you didn't use them on the other letters. it would fit better to the geometrical charakter of the typeface and the current solution is too random in my opinion.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3731http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3731@saberrider: You are absolutely right. I wanted to use diagonals for the V. The problem is, this font uses 1.8 × 1.8 brick scaling to achieve the slivers of negative space. That scaling caused a problem of leaving gaps between each brick, which I had to fill with overlapping bricks, placed strategically. This same technique give rise to the pin holes as well. Using the appropriate overlapping brick at specific intersection was the key in getting the smooth curves and fills. This technique worked for all characters except the V. The gaps left by the angled bricks was not possible to fill using any existing overlapping brick. The rounded edges of the V were the only possible way to stay within the parameters of this font's design. Having said all that, I actually like the V solution. I worked up other angled V's here (see below) to show how the angles did not work in this font. (The overlapped areas are light purple (?) in the image below). I appreciate you taking the time to review each character and offer advice. It is one of the reasons I keep coming back to this place. Thank you.<br /><img src="/showings/show/380" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3732http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3732Can I disagree? If you have to bring the V into line, you've got to bring the X in line too. Although it's more "right" than the V it's also on the cusp of weird. No no no. I reckon the V is inspired and shouldn't be mucked about with. There are plenty of famous fonts that have one or two quirky "wrong" characters. We don't see them as wrong any more because we don't see the wrongness anymore. I love that. Sorry saberrider I reckon thalamic was visited by the muse one night and everything about this font is <i>perfect</i>.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3741http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3741Thanks, intaglio. :) I do believe that one of the reasons this font works is because although there are strong design limitations in this font, they are not so strict that they cannot be violated here and there. It makes the flow of characters less monotonous...I think.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3760http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3760FS_Minimal...now with lowercase, $ and--thanks for reminding me, intaglio--introbang.<br /><img src="/showings/show/385" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3765http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3765gorgeous.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3774http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3774@i: :DThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3777http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/104974#3777I've been trying to take a break from the guilty pleasure of FontStruct to get some actual work done, but I couldn't help myself with this. This one's sweet, thalamic. Love the lowercase samples. 1.8 is a tricky grid workspace and you've done really well with it. Here's just another option for the V that is in between existing solutions. The only other character I'd modify is the left side of the number 7 which I would raise one grid space to set it apart from the number 9. I also share your attitude of releasing a font by "letting it free." :-)<br /><img src="/showings/show/389" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000